News
Fund governance best practices to satisfy limited partner and regulator scrutiny
Strong fund governance is not a paperwork exercise. In private funds, it is the operating system that keeps decision-making disciplined, conflicts visible, and stakeholders aligned. As private funds scale, expectations rise too. Limited partners want confidence. Regulators want evidence.
Why strong governance is non-negotiable in private funds
Private funds are often more bespoke than public vehicles, and they rely heavily on contractual terms for oversight and management. That flexibility is valuable. It can also create gaps if processes are unclear, inconsistently applied, or poorly documented.
Three forces make fund governance standards especially important right now.
First, enforcement has reinforced how costly weak controls can be. In fiscal year 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed 583 enforcement actions and obtained $8.2 billion in financial remedies. The headline numbers are broad, but the takeaway for private fund managers is direct: conflicts, disclosure, and documentation still matter, and they need to be provable.
Second, strategies and structures have become more complex. Continuation vehicles, co-investments, NAV-based facilities, and hybrid mandates can create gray areas in allocation, valuation, liquidity planning, and approvals. Governance helps define the rules before a transaction forces decisions under pressure.
Third, governance shapes the investor experience. Timely reporting, consistent approvals, and clear escalation reduce friction. That is especially true during audits, fundraising, and major portfolio events, when questions arrive quickly and stakeholders expect fast, consistent answers.
What institutional limited partners expect from fund governance
Institutional limited partners vary, but expectations tend to converge on a few themes.
Clear conflict management
Many limited partners look to the Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA) Principles as a benchmark. ILPA highlights that conflicts may require limited partner advisory committee (LPAC) approval, and that disclosure alone should not automatically make a conflict acceptable.
In practice, managers benefit from a conflict register, a defined approval path, and minutes that capture the decision and the rationale.
LPAC effectiveness
An LPAC should have a clear remit and operating rhythm. Typical areas include conflicts, related-party transactions, valuation policy oversight, and select expense approvals. A strong LPAC process also reduces “back-channel” questions because investors know there is a trusted forum for sensitive topics.
Reserved matters and voting mechanics
Map decisions that require investor consent and make the mechanics operational. Ambiguity here is expensive. It can delay time-sensitive transactions, complicate closings, and create avoidable negotiation late in the process.
Independence where it matters
Independence may mean independent directors in certain jurisdictions, third-party valuation input for harder-to-price assets, or independent review of specific transactions. The goal is credible challenge and defensible outcomes, not governance for its own sake.
Supporting governance bodies
Many managers benefit from a compliance and risk forum that meets monthly, even if informal. Use it to review incident logs, policy exceptions, upcoming disclosures, and operational risks that cut across functions.
Enhancing oversight with clear documentation
Fund governance standards are only as strong as the records that support them. Documentation is not about volume. It is about traceability, so decisions can be reconstructed quickly and confidently.
Strong documentation is also easier to maintain with the right operating model and fund regulatory reporting services support.
Codify the policies investors ask about most
Start with conflicts of interest, valuation, fees and expenses, side letters, and material non-public information handling. Assign an owner and a review cadence. If a policy does not reflect how the team actually operates, update it. A policy that is ignored is a liability.
Build side letter governance into the process
Track side letter obligations centrally and tie them to workflows. If a reporting promise is made to one investor, the team should be able to deliver it reliably. The team should also be able to assess whether it creates operational or fairness risks for others.
Create an escalation framework that fits the fund’s risk profile
Define severity tiers and triggers for LPAC notification, investor communication, or external counsel engagement. Then test it. Tabletop exercises can surface gaps early, when fixing them is cheap.
Make disclosure workflows repeatable
Align the calendar for quarterly reporting and annual audits. Track exceptions and recurring investor questions. Then use that feedback to strengthen governance over time. Small improvements here reduce quarter-end fire drills and improve consistency across funds.
Aligning governance with ESG and Risk Management
Good fund governance connects ESG to the same control environment that governs valuation, liquidity, and conflicts. That means clear ownership, defined metrics, and validation.
Set ESG governance roles early
Decide who owns the ESG policy, who owns data collection, and who signs off on reporting. If portfolio companies are expected to deliver data, define timelines, formats, and quality checks.
Integrate ESG into risk management
Many ESG issues show up as operational risk: safety incidents, cybersecurity, supply chain exposure, regulatory change, and climate-related physical risk. Define how these risks are monitored and escalated, alongside financial risk.
Govern technology like any other control
Many ESG issues show up as operational risk: safety incidents, cybersecurity, supply chain exposure, regulatory change, and climate-related physical risk. Define how these risks are monitored and escalated, alongside financial risk.
Bringing it together
Fund governance is how you turn promises into proof. For chief operating officers, chief financial officers, and compliance leaders, it is also a lever for speed. When decision rights are clear and records are reliable, issues are resolved faster, and investor conversations are easier to manage.
A pragmatic next step is to pressure-test your current framework against the moments that matter most: a conflicted transaction, a valuation challenge, a key person event, or an investor disclosure question on a tight deadline. If your team cannot point to the policy, the owner, and the approval path in minutes, that is a signal to tighten the system.
Learn more about Alter Domus fund governance services.
