Analysis

How fund administration supports scaling-up venture capital operations

Every venture capital firm aspires to grow with time, whether that means raising larger funds, managing a broader portfolio, or expanding into new markets. However, growth often comes with increased operational complexity.

As the firm expands, managing critical tasks like capital calls and distributions, investor reporting, compliance, and governance in-house can start straining internal resources and divert attention from core fund priorities like sourcing deals and providing strategic support to portfolio companies.

In light of this, many VC firms are increasingly turning to professional fund administration.  These services provide the expertise, systems and infrastructure that VC firms need to scale effectively, without sacrificing operational efficiency or affecting the ability to meet their obligations to investors and regulatory authorities. 

In this guide, we’ll dive deeper into the role of fund administrators in helping VC firms scale, including the key functions these entities provide.


people collaborative at meeting

Challenges of scaling up venture capital operations

Before we get into how fund administration can enable more efficient scaling, let’s first look at three major operational challenges that many venture capital firms face as they expand their operations.

Increased fund complexity

Scaling a venture capital operation usually includes either launching more funds, managing larger funds, or structuring funds in increasingly complex ways. All these changes add operational strain to the firm.

  • Increased number of funds: Managing multiple funds, each with its own investment focus, lifecycle, and mandate, creates a higher administrative burden. More funds require more resources to ensure each operates smoothly and in line with its objectives.
  • Larger funds: Bigger funds demand more disciplined capital deployment, enhanced reporting, and a stronger internal team to manage investor relations.
  • Complex fund structures: Specialized funds, such as region-specific funds, co-investment vehicles, and special purpose entities (SPEs), introduce additional layers of governance, reporting, and compliance obligations.

Regulatory burdens increase

Growth venture capital firms also tend to increase their exposure to regulatory scrutiny. For example, crossing certain AUM thresholds can trigger mandatory filings with relevant regulators like the SEC. Additionally, more investors mean more Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance work.

International expansion adds additional complexity to regulatory requirements. Firms must follow varying regulations, such as tax codes, disclosure rules, and securities laws, in each jurisdiction where they operate. Staying on top of all regulatory obligations can be quite challenging.

Growing LP demands for transparency

Limited Partners (LPs) are increasingly expecting greater transparency and more comprehensive reporting from General Partners (GPs) in the private equity industry. They want more frequent, detailed, and transparent reporting, not just during fundraising rounds, but throughout the fund lifecycle. This includes timely capital account statements, NAV updates, performance metrics, and ESG disclosures. 

Meeting these heightened expectations for an increased number of investors and funds can be challenging without the proper mechanisms and support in place. 

The good news for VC firms is that these challenges are manageable. One of the most effective solutions is leveraging professional fund administration services.

What is venture capital fund administration?

Venture capital fund administration involves outsourcing back-office tasks to a specialized third-party firm. Essentially, the third-party, known as a fund administrator, takes over the day-to-day operational or administrative tasks, such as fund accounting, investor reporting, and regulatory compliance, that VC firms would otherwise need to manage in-house.

How fund administration helps scale venture capital firms

Fund administration plays a crucial role in supporting firms during periods of expansion by managing the increasing demands of back-office functions. For example, they can provide support in several key areas, including the following.

Streamlining capital call and distribution processes

Fund administration automates and organizes the capital call and distribution workflow, ensuring that these transactions are executed seamlessly and on time. This reduces the manual workload on VC firms, mitigates the risk of errors and improves the overall experience for investors.

Enhancing LP reporting and transparency

Fund administration provides the necessary infrastructure to ensure that all limited partners (LPs) receive timely, accurate, and consistent reports on their investments. Such transparency fosters trust and confidence among investors and helps maintain strong, ongoing relationships as the firm scales its operations.

Supporting regulatory compliance and governance

Fund administrators ensure that VC firms meet all regulatory obligations as they scale by managing the necessary filings and documentation. They handle KYC and AML checks and maintain proper records on these. In addition, fund administrators closely monitor changes in the regulatory environment and advise firms on any changes they might need to make to ensure compliance.

Why outsourcing fund administration makes strategic sense

According to a 2024 Ocorian survey,  99% of private equity, venture capital, and real estate fund managers globally plan to increase outsourcing over the next three years, with nearly half (46%) targeting a 25–50% increase in outsourced functions.

Besides helping firms overcome some of the operational complexities that come with scaling, outsourcing fund administrations offers several other significant advantages.

Cost savings

Building an in-house fund administration team requires significant resources, including hiring specialized staff, investing in technology, and training employees to keep up with changing regulations. As a firm grows, the costs associated with maintaining this infrastructure can quickly add up. 

Outsourcing to a third-party fund administrator like Alter Domus, allows VC firms to leverage professional services and technology without the overhead of managing these functions internally.

Access to specialized expertise and evolving best practices

Outsourcing gives VC firms access to professionals who are highly experienced in private fund structures and up to date with the latest regulations, best practices, and financial technologies. This ensures higher accuracy and professionalism across key fund activities, including accounting and investor reporting.

Freeing internal teams to focus on core investing activities

Perhaps one of the most significant benefits of outsourcing fund administration is that it frees internal teams to prioritize sourcing, evaluating, and managing investments. 

By offloading the time-consuming and often complex administrative tasks deal teams can dedicate their expertise and energy to identifying promising investment opportunities and actively supporting their portfolio companies. This ensures that the core value-creation activities of the VC firm remain the central focus.

Alter Domus: A partner in venture capital fund administration

If you’re looking for a fund administration partner that offers deep industry expertise, great flexibility, and tailored solutions to support your growth, Alter Domus could be a good fit.

Here’s what you can expect when you partner with Alter Domus:

Comprehensive fund accounting:

Expert management of fund accounting, including investment tracking, valuations, waterfall and carried interest calculations, and much more.

Investor reporting:

Detailed and transparent reporting to keep your investors informed about the performance and health of their investments and the fund in general..

Capital call and distribution processing:

Streamlined management of capital calls and distributions to ensure accuracy and timely execution.

Regulatory compliance support:

Comprehensive guidance on meeting regulatory requirements and maintaining compliance across different jurisdictions.

Tech-driven solutions:

Integration of advanced fund administration solutions designed to automate workflows, enhance operational efficiency, and provide real-time transparency.

Full fund lifecycle management:

End-to-end support, from fund formation through to exit, with tailored services to ensure smooth operation at all stages.

Audit support:

Comprehensive audit assistance, including the preparation of relevant documentation and coordination with auditors to ensure a smooth audit process.

Wrapping up: How venture capital fund administration supports growth 

Fund administration plays a key role in the growth of venture capital firms by providing the structure and expertise needed to manage increasing operational demands and complexity. It takes care of administrative tasks like fund accounting, investor reporting, and compliance management, which frees internal teams to focus on what matters most: identifying high-potential investments and driving growth.

With deep industry knowledge and a commitment to excellence, Alter Domus is the ideal venture capital fund administration partner to help streamline operations and support your firm’s growth. Explore Alter Domus venture capital solutions and fund administration solutions to learn more.

News

Fund accounting & reporting services for venture capital firms

Venture capital accounting is a niche field of accounting that focuses on managing, tracking, and reporting the financial operations of venture capital (VC) funds.  

Unlike traditional business accounting, which is primarily concerned with the revenue, expense, and profits of a company, venture capital accounting involves more complex financial structures and tasks, such as tracking capital contributions, calculating investment valuations, and managing the distribution of returns. 

In this guide, we will explore the essential components of venture capital accounting and explain some of the benefits of outsourcing this critical function to specialized fund accounting services providers like Alter Domus.


technology man holding iPad showing data scaled

The unique fund accounting needs of venture capital firms

Venture capital (VC) firms operate in a dynamic and highly specialized environment within the private markets space. As a result, their fund accounting needs are markedly different from those of  investment managers with public market strategies. 

Below are some accounting functions and needs unique to venture capital firms:

Capital calls and distributions management:

Managing and documenting capital calls to limited partners (LPs) and distributions from the fund, and ensuring proper allocation based on ownership and allocation ratios.

Portfolio company valuation:

Performing periodic valuation of portfolio companies according to industry standards.

Carried interest and waterfall calculations:

Tracking carried interest (carry) and modelling complex waterfall structures to determine profit allocations among stakeholders.

Net asset value (NAV) calculation:

Determining the fund’s NAV, which represents the total value of the fund’s assets minus its liabilities.

Fee management:

alculating and tracking management fees, performance fees, and reimbursements at both fund and investor levels.

Investor reporting:

Providing timely, transparent, and customized reports to limited partners.

Audit and compliance support:

Maintaining detailed records to support annual audits tax filings, and compliance with both local regulations and foreign ones, such as the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) in Europe.

Why timely and transparent financial reporting matters for VC firms

Because venture funds typically operate with long timelines and limited liquidity, LPs depend on clear and regular reporting to understand how their capital is being deployed and managed. This includes updates on valuations, capital movements, and overall fund performance. 

As such, the ability to deliver accurate and timely information can be a major strategic advantage for VC firms, offering the following benefits:

Increased trust and credibility with LPs:

Timely and transparent reporting fosters trust by showing that the firm is actively monitoring the financial health of its portfolio and making informed decisions. When investors can see accurate and up-to-date financial data, they are more likely to stay engaged and confident in the firm’s ability to manage their money.

Better reputation in the market:

Firms that consistently provide accurate, transparent financial reporting are often viewed more favorably in the market. A track record of transparent reporting serves as a signal of professionalism and operational maturity. This reputation can help attract new investors, high-quality investments, talented portfolio companies, and top-tier talent. All this can contribute to long-term success.

Regulatory compliance and risk mitigation:

VC firms are subject to regulatory requirements that demand accurate financial disclosures. Transparent reporting ensures compliance with these regulations, avoiding legal complications and potential penalties from bodies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Benefits of outsourcing fund accounting and reporting for VC firms

According to a Dynamo Software survey, one of the biggest challenges facing venture capital and private equity funds today is financial reporting, with 64% reporting delays in preparing financial reports. This is not exactly surprising as venture capital fund accounting can be quite complex and demanding. 

Indeed, this is one of the primary reasons many VC firms today are choosing to outsource this crucial function to specialized fund accounting services providers like Alter Domus. 

Outsourcing venture capital fund accounting and reporting offers several advantages, including the following:

Access to expertise and best practices:

Fund accounting is a specialized discipline that requires deep knowledge of financial regulations, valuation methodologies, and industry-specific reporting standards. Outsourcing gives VC firms access to professionals who are highly experienced in private fund structures and who are up-to-date with the latest regulatory changes and best practices. This ensures a higher level of accuracy and professionalism in all financial reporting.

Improved compliance and risk management:

Regulatory scrutiny of VC firms has increased, making it more important than ever to ensure accurate, timely, and compliant financial reporting. Fund accounting service providers use standardized processes and dedicated controls that reduce the likelihood of errors and help meet fiduciary and regulatory obligations. This helps VC firms avoid costly mistakes and reputational damage.

Cost savings and efficiency:

Outsourcing venture capital fund accounting helps firms reduce the overhead costs associated with maintaining an in-house accounting team. Hiring, training, and retaining skilled professionals can be expensive, especially when the workload fluctuates. Third-party service providers offer scalable solutions, allowing firms to pay for exactly what they need when they need it.

Faster, more consistent reporting:

Experienced third-party providers typically leverage purpose-built technologies and automation tools to deliver consistent, timely reporting. As previously mentioned, better reporting improves investor trust and confidence and can increase a VC firm’s overall reputation and perception in the market.

Freedom to focus on core investment activities:

Outsourcing fund accounting and reporting frees up internal resources to focus on high-value activities like building relationships with investors, sourcing new deals, and optimizing the performance of their portfolio companies.

How Alter Domus supports fund accounting and reporting for venture capital firms

Alter Domus is a global fund administrator with deep expertise in alternative assets such as venture capital funds. The company helps VC firms better manage their accounting and reporting needs with a range of practical and reliable services that include:

Capital call and distribution processing:

Managing the process of capital calls and distributions of proceeds.  

NAV calculation:

Accurate and timely calculation of Net Asset Value (NAV).

Management fee and carried interest calculations:

Accurate calculation and processing of management fees and carried interest in line with fund agreements.

Financial statement preparation:

Preparing financial statements in accordance with relevant accounting standards (e.g., IFRS, US GAAP).

Tax compliance support:

Assisting in preparing tax documentation and ensuring compliance with relevant regulations.  

Investor Reporting:

Generating customized reports for investors that provide clarity on fund performance, portfolio holdings, and financial activities.

Wrapping up: Fund accounting & reporting for venture capital firms

Venture capital accounting is vastly different from traditional accounting. It includes unique tasks such as tracking capital calls, conducting fair value assessments, calculating carried interest, and managing complex portfolio valuations. These tasks require specialized knowledge and systems to ensure accuracy, compliance, and timely reporting.

As such, many VC firms are turning to expert fund administrators to handle these specialized accounting tasks. Alter Domus is one such provider, offering accounting and reporting services built around the specific needs of venture capital funds. Learn more about Alter Domus’ venture capital solutions and fund administration services, or get in touch to discuss how we can help with your fund’s accounting and reporting requirements.

Insights

architecture buildings curved bridge scaled
EventsAugust 20, 2025

ANREV Australia Conference 2025

Creative professional business people working on business project in office
AnalysisAugust 7, 2025

How Private Equity Funds are Structured

man at event
AnalysisAugust 7, 2025

How Private Equity Waterfalls Work

Analysis

Venture capital compliance requirements

Venture capital funds are pooled investment vehicles that provide financing to startups and emerging companies with high growth potential. In exchange, they take an ownership stake and aim to generate significant returns by exiting these investments later on through events like initial public offerings (IPOs), mergers, or acquisitions.

Like all participants in the financial markets, venture capital funds are subject to a range of regulations designed to ensure transparency, protect investors, and maintain market integrity.

For VC managers, understanding and adhering to these regulations is crucial not only to avoid legal repercussions and penalties, but also to build investor trust, manage risks effectively, and secure the long-term success of both the fund and its portfolio companies.

This article explores the key compliance requirements that apply to venture capital firms, the challenges of managing compliance internally, and how fund administrators like Alter Domus can support VC firms in meeting their obligations.


architecture colored panels

Key compliance obligations for VC firms

Let’s look at some of the key compliance requirements for starting and managing a venture capital firm or fund.

SEC registration and reporting

Most venture capital funds in the US are typically “private funds,” which means they don’t need to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as ‘investment companies”.. 

What’s more, many VC firms are classified as Exempt Reporting Advisers (ERAs) under the Dodd-Frank Act, and as such, they are not required to register with the SEC as investment advisers. 

However, VC firms are still subject to certain obligations. This includes completing specific sections of Form ADV Part 1A, such as information about their business, ownership, and any sanctions they or their personnel have faced. 

In addition, VC firms that qualify as ERAs are required to regularly update their Form ADV to ensure the SEC has accurate and timely information. This includes 2 key obligations.

  • ERAs must file an update to Form ADV at least once annually, within 90 days of the end of their fiscal year.
  • In addition to the annual filing, firms must promptly amend Form ADV whenever there are material changes to the information previously disclosed, such as changes or updates in ownership, business structure, or disciplinary history.

Fundraising and marketing

Most VC firms raise capital from investors through “exempt offerings,” which essentially allows them to sell securities without registering with the SEC.The most commonly used exemption is Regulation D, particularly Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c).

Rule 506(b) allows VC firms to raise an unlimited amount of money from accredited investors and up to 35 non-accredited investors. However, this rule forbids general solicitation, meaning that firms cannot publicly advertise their offerings or use broad marketing tactics. All fundraising efforts must be done privately, typically through existing relationships or direct outreach.  

Rule 506(c) offers a different approach by permitting general solicitation and public advertising, opening up the possibility of reaching a wider pool of potential investors. However, this flexibility comes with a significant condition: all purchasers of the fund’s interests must be accredited investors, and the venture capital fund must undertake reasonable measures to confirm each investor’s accredited status.

Regardless of whether a venture capital fund uses Rule 506(b) or 506(c), a critical compliance requirement under Regulation D is the timely filing of Form D with the SEC. This brief notice, which provides basic details about the offering, including the amount being raised and the type of investors targeted, must be submitted within 15 days after the first sale of securities.

In addition to the aforementioned SEC regulations, venture capital funds must also be mindful of state-level securities laws, often referred to as “blue sky laws,” in each state where they solicit investors. These state regulations may impose additional requirements that firms must meet alongside the federal rules of Regulation D. 

It’s crucial to consult legal counsel to ensure compliance with state requirements.

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) Requirements

Previously, many venture capital firms, particularly those that qualified as ERAs, were not required to follow comprehensive Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations in the same way as banks or broker-dealers under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). 

While the SEC could take enforcement actions related to misleading statements about voluntary AML procedures, there was no direct mandate under the BSA for these VC firms to establish full-fledged AML programs.

However, a significant regulatory shift is on the horizon with a final rule issued by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) on August 28, 2024.

This new rule amends the BSA regulations to include certain SEC-registered investment advisers (RIAs) and ERAs within the definition of “financial institution” under the BSA. This means that a significant portion of venture capital fund managers will now be directly subject to AML obligations.

Specifically, from January 1, 2026,  VC firms must establish formal AML compliance programs that include procedures for identifying and reporting suspicious activities, conducting risk assessments, and maintaining thorough records. Additionally, firms must implement Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols to verify the identity of their investors and assess the source of their funds.

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations

Although Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting isn’t yet a formal compliance requirement for many venture capital firms, it has rapidly become a significant area of focus for both regulators and investors. 

In regions like the EU, regulations such as the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) are already pushing firms to disclose how they integrate ESG factors. Though these regulations are currently more applicable to larger firms, they signal a shift that may expand to all VC firms over time.

In the U.S., the SEC has adopted rules for public companies to disclose climate-related risks. Similar frameworks could eventually extend to private funds, including venture capital firms. 

What’s more, LPs are increasingly demanding greater ESG data reporting from firms, with some even willing to pay more for it. For example, according to a report by PwC Luxembourg, two-thirds of surveyed LPs indicated a willingness to pay higher management fees if it leads to significant improvements in ESG data reporting by their GPs.

Additionally, nearly 45% of respondents said they would consider a fee increase of 5% to 9% if it resulted in more comprehensive and higher-quality ESG reporting practices.

Proactively adopting ESG policies and reporting frameworks can prepare VCs for future regulatory changes and at the same time help gain a competitive edge in the market by demonstrating to investors that they are forward-thinking, transparent, and responsible in their approach to managing investments.

Strategic importance of compliance

Builds trust and credibility:

A strong compliance record signals to investors and portfolio companies that the VC firm operates ethically and with integrity. This fosters trust and enhances the firm’s reputation, which is crucial for attracting and retaining both investors and promising startups.  

Non-compliance can lead to significant fines, legal battles, and even the loss of licenses to operate. A sturdy compliance program minimizes these risks.  

Protects against financial crime:

Implementing strong KYC and AML procedures, as mandated by regulations, safeguards the firm and its investors from financial crimes and reputational damage.

Challenges of managing compliance internally

High resource demands:

Effectively managing compliance internally demands significant time and personnel. For smaller venture capital firms, this can stretch resources thin and lead to oversight gaps where certain regulatory requirements are missed or misunderstood.

Constantly changing regulations:

The regulatory environment for venture capital is complex and frequently shifting, with new rules, reporting standards, and jurisdictional requirements. Keeping pace with these changes internally is difficult, especially for firms operating across multiple regions. This increases the likelihood of inadvertent noncompliance.

Insufficient internal expertise:

Compliance requires deep knowledge of specialized areas, such as financial regulations, anti-money laundering policies, and evolving trends like ESG disclosures. Many firms, particularly smaller ones, lack professionals with expertise in these areas. This lack of sufficient in-house expertise could lead to misinterpretations of regulatory requirements and thus non-compliance.

Rising operational costs:

Maintaining compliance internally can be expensive. Firms may need to invest in additional staff, ongoing training, continuous monitoring, and internal audits.  For smaller firms, these added costs can divert resources away from other important business activities, such as deal sourcing and portfolio management.

How Alter Domus supports venture capital compliance

Alter Domus provides specialized compliance services that help venture capital firms meet regulatory requirements effortlessly. Key areas of support include:

Regulatory filings:

Assistance with the preparation and submission of crucial filings such as Form ADV, Form D, and other jurisdictional reporting obligations.

Ongoing monitoring and support:

Continuous monitoring of regulatory changes and updates relevant to VC firms, proactive communication of these changes, and ongoing support in adapting compliance programs accordingly.

AML and KYC support:

Assistance with creating, implementing, and maintaining KYC and AML programs.

ESG reporting support:

Assistance with ESG data collection, aligning with relevant ESG frameworks, and preparing ESG disclosures to meet the expectations of limited partners and comply with any relevant regulations.

Audit support:

Assistance with audit preparation, including organizing required documents, coordinating with auditors, and addressing audit-related questions or issues.

Final thoughts: Venture capital compliance requirements

Compliance management is a critical function in venture capital firms. Besides helping firms meet legal requirements, it builds investor trusts, reduces risk exposure, and contributes to long-term operational stability.

However, for firms with lean teams, staying on top of compliance can be time-consuming and complex. This is where specialized support, like that provided by a fund administrator like Alter Domus, can make a big difference.

Alter Domus takes care of your compliance requirements and operations, including regulatory filings, AML/KYC implementation, and ESG reporting, so you and your team can focus on your core business of finding and nurturing high-potential startups without having to worry about meeting your regulatory obligations.

Explore Alter Domus administration and governance solutions or reach out to our team today to learn more about how we can support your firm’s compliance strategy today.

Analysis

Portfolio optimization and the Alter Domus Score: A use case for CLOs

Why the Alter Domus Scores’ simplicity, robustness, and capacity for automation makes it an effective metric for trade optimization.


colleagues celebrating success

Overview

Alter Domus recently introduced the Alter Domus Score (ADS), a metric for fixed income assets that managers can use to improve their portfolio trade optimization decisions. The ADS is unit-based and can be applied universally across all types of fixed income assets, allowing managers to rank order assets based on relative value. The ADS is useful for managers when considering portfolio allocation tradeoffs where constraints exist. These constraints can be market, investor, or regulatory based.

In this paper, collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) are referenced as a use case to demonstrate how a CLO manager can apply the ADS framework to help optimize portfolio allocations. An example of ADS portfolio optimization in a typical environment for CLO managers is presented. The objective of the CLO manager in this case is to maximize the overall portfolio ADS while adhering to various constraints.

The examples first cover the case for a single CLO portfolio and then expand to a scenario in which a CLO manager seeks to optimize its portfolio allocations across multiple CLO portfolios. The goal is to provide an overview of the practical applications of the ADS framework.

Portfolio optimization and ADS: a use case for CLOs

A typical US-based CLO portfolio includes primarily first-lien senior secured loans to corporate borrowers. These portfolios are managed actively, with trading adhering to reinvestment criteria outlined in the CLO’s indenture. The lifecycle of a CLO usually includes a ramp-up period, a reinvestment period, and an amortization period.

The reinvestment criteria establish the rules within which the asset manager can trade. In addition to defining the types of assets that can be purchased (such as eligible collateral obligations), these criteria generally include various categories of portfolio-level constraints [1]:

  • Portfolio concentration limitations,
  • Collateral quality tests, and
  • Coverage tests.

To enhance the efficiency and productivity of investable capital while adhering to reinvestment criteria, managers carefully navigate various trade-offs in portfolio allocation decisions. By adopting a trade optimization approach, managers effectively refine their investment choices so that they strike the right balance between risk and return. This strategic method not only maximizes capital utilization but also aligns with the overarching investment goals.

A CLO manager has a range of metrics to optimize, such as yield, portfolio par, or average life. In this context, we previously outlined the benefits of utilizing ADS as a foundation for potentially enhancing optimization or generating trade ideas. The ADS, unlike other metrics, offers a parsimonious, objective, and easy-to-use measure that is ideal for trade optimization.

It is important to recognize that, beyond the general reinvestment criteria outlined in the CLO indenture, managers are faced with additional key external constraints dictated by market conditions – specifically, the array of investments available for purchase as well as prevailing market prices. Consequently, fundamental questions arise, such as determining the universe of eligible assets available for acquisition and their corresponding prices. Furthermore, it is necessary to consider whether asset substitutions within the existing portfolio could lead to a more optimal solution. This consideration applies to prospective assets in both the primary and secondary loan markets. Incorporating robust trade optimization methods and tools, alongside the manager’s credit and trading expertise, enhances the manager’s ability to balance a portfolio’s risk-return profile while adhering to constraints.

Exhibit 1 outlines the primary objective of maximizing the overall weighted average ADS, in accordance with the constraints generally specified by a CLO indenture. The exhibit includes examples of typical constraints applicable to a CLO, assuming that any asset under consideration meets the eligibility criteria for purchase. In other words, the goal is to find the optimal asset weights in a portfolio that will maximize ADS while adhering to specified constraints [2].

Exhibit 1: ADS optimization objective for a typical CLO portfolio

In theory, there could be multiple optimal solutions due to various possible portfolio compositions that could meet all constraints, though in practice this is a remote possibility. Typically, some flexibility remains within certain constraints given the available assets and considering a CLO manager’s discretion. In many CLOs, specific tests can often be adjusted, allowing room for one test (like recovery rate) to impact (or modify) the WARF or WAS test. This ultimately leads to finding a more optimal solution, assuming the manager determines that the tradeoff is justified.

Portfolio allocations across CLOs

The optimization objective described above pertains to a single CLO portfolio. However, CLO managers often oversee multiple CLOs simultaneously as they are repeat issuers. The complexity increases as these CLOs may have been issued under different market conditions over time. Additionally, there could be some differences in the constraints applicable to each CLO. Other examples include varying experiences in ratings migration within the portfolio, and some CLOs may be at different stages in their lifecycle, such as during reinvestment or amortization periods. These factors contribute to the complexity of constraints.

In the simplest scenario, the ADS can be optimized independently for each CLO, assuming there are no constraints on the availability of assets to be purchased or traded. In this case, the proportion of allocation to each individual asset is chosen optimally to provide the maximum marginal increase to the ADS for each CLO portfolio. Therefore, it is possible for the optimal portfolio allocation of any prospective asset to range from 0% to 100% for any given CLO.

However, it is not straightforward in practice. The following scenarios are examples that point out potential constraints that may limit an optimal solution across CLO portfolios:

  • Limited availability – the CLO manager may encounter a limited supply of certain assets within the marketplace.
  • Legal/compliance requirements – the CLO manager may be subject to internal directives imposed by legal and compliance guidelines, which govern asset allocations across the manager’s CLOs.

Exhibit 2: Potential portfolio allocations to a loan under various scenarios

Exhibit 2 above provides an example of a manager looking to reinvest cash proceeds with potential allocations for a particular loan, Loan #1, across three CLOs. The optimal allocation suggests that a total of $16MM should be distributed across the CLOs as shown in the unconstrained scenario. This assumes that the optimal solution is based on the maximization objective described earlier, where the analysis is subject to each individual CLO’s constraints.

If the manager determines that only $10MM of Loan #1 is available, the optimal solution (assuming the greatest marginal benefit is realized by CLO #3) then suggests a different allocation accordingly as shown in the constrained scenario. The analysis also suggests that the remaining $6MM of cash proceeds should be invested in two additional loans, Loan #2 and Loan #3, with respective allocations.

In instances where there is a strict legal or compliance requirement for proportional distribution of the asset, the process is straightforward. Although internal guidelines may recommend a specific portfolio allocation for an individual investment, various factors related to any CLO could prevent this. These factors include potential breaches of certain portfolio constraints, such as limits on borrower, industry, or rating concentrations.

It is understood that these additional limitations result in a suboptimal solution compared to the theoretical unconstrained case – essentially, we could say that this solution is the ‘optimal practical’ solution.

This example suggests that an iterative process would likely occur in practice to find an optimal practical solution, especially if the analysis is conducted on a pro forma basis or after the manager learns what is ultimately available in the marketplace, potentially even with changes in market prices.

To conclude

Fixed income managers often consider tradeoffs when making investment decisions to efficiently deploy investable capital. Alter Domus has introduced the ADS as a basis for managers to enhance their portfolio trade optimization decisions based on one objective and sound metric that is applicable across all fixed income investments. The ADS can be particularly useful in helping managers achieve the best relative value for their investments while facing constraints.

CLOs have been presented as a use case to demonstrate how a CLO manager can apply the ADS framework to optimize portfolio allocations. The example described earlier illustrated ADS portfolio optimization in an environment typical for CLO managers. The objective of the CLO manager is to maximize the overall portfolio ADS while adhering to various constraints as outlined in a CLO indenture. While managers can use other variables such as yield or portfolio par to optimize their portfolio, it has been demonstrated that using the ADS as an alternative metric can be beneficial since it incorporates into one measure the major variables considered in trading credit instruments.

The ADS serves as an effective metric for trade optimization, thanks to its simplicity, robustness, and capacity for automation. Its straightforward nature allows for easy interpretation, while its consistency supports investment decision-making across different market conditions for fixed income investments. Additionally, the automation aspect streamlines the optimization process, making it a valuable tool for enhancing trading strategies.

For AD clients, including clients of Solvas and Enterprise Credit & Risk Analytics, the ADS is offered as an additional measure to support our clients with their trade optimization, portfolio allocation, and risk analytics.

Please contact [email protected] for further information on how to access the ADS.


[1] The reinvestment criteria often involve more detailed requirements than mentioned here. These include par maintenance conditions, variations in criteria based on different trading classifications (such as credit risk/improved, defaulted or discretionary), and can vary depending on the CLO’s lifecycle stage. Additionally, the criteria can differ across CLOs with trading conditions that may be agreed upon between parties before the CLO’s inception, such as deep discount conditions, excess Caa/CCC haircut conditions, or amend to extend guidelines.

[2] Alter Domus utilizes a mixed integer linear programming platform to find the optimal solution for these situations. This method of optimization is well-documented in scientific literature.




Insights

architecture buildings curved bridge scaled
EventsAugust 20, 2025

ANREV Australia Conference 2025

Creative professional business people working on business project in office
AnalysisAugust 7, 2025

How Private Equity Funds are Structured

man at event
AnalysisAugust 7, 2025

How Private Equity Waterfalls Work

Analysis

Private markets pioneers: The rise of interval funds

As private markets managers adopt new fund structures in order to attract non-institutional capital and provide institutional with additional flexibility, interval funds are emerging as a structure of choice for many.

In the fourth of a five-part series, Alter Domus reviews the rapid growth of interval fund assets under management (AUM), the reasons for the structure’s popularity, and the operational and investment capability managers require to run interval funds successfully.


airplane wing scaled

At a time when closing a traditional, ten-year private markets fund has been challenging, managers raising capital through interval funds have seen assets under management (AUM) accelerate.

In the US alone, interval fund AUM has almost quadrupled during the last five years, increasing from just US$18.6 billion in January 2020 to US$93.4 billion in January 2025, according to Morningstar figures reported by Pitchbook.

Interval AUM has surged during a period when private markets fundraising has been in decline. Year-on-year fundraising has now fallen for three consecutive years and in 2024 was down 30 percent on the five-year average, according to Bain & Co analysis.

The growth in interval fund assets has provided a timely capital boost for the alternative assets industry at a difficult point in the fundraising cycle.

Breaking down barriers

Interval funds have been available to investors as early as the 1990s but have experienced a surge in popularity during the last five years as managers have moved to broaden investor bases and raise more capital from non-institutional channels.

The non-institutional investor market has been difficult for private markets managers to crack, with the investment minimums and long periods of illiquidity associated with the traditional, 10-year, close-ended private markets fund an awkward fit for individuals and family investors who have smaller amounts to invest and require more flexibility than long-term horizon institutional investors. A 2024 survey of 100 financial advisers by consultancy NextWealth found that illiquidity was one of the biggest barriers to individual investors investing in private markets.

The huge opportunity that the democratization of private markets presents, however, is so vast (Bain & Co forecasts suggest that non-institutional allocations to alternatives could climb as high as US$12 trillion by 2034) that managers are now working harder than ever to improve their reach into the non-institutional market, and interval funds have emerged as one of the most popular ways of doing so.

Interval funds, however, are not exclusively the preserve of non-institutional investors, with managers offering interval fund investing opportunities noticing strong appetite from institutional clients too.

Ten-year funds are generally a good fit for institutions investing over the long-term, but the flexibility of the interval fund has appealed to LPs too, who like the having the option of adjusting private markets exposure without having to go into the secondaries market, as well as the immediate exposure to private markets assets that interval funds provide.

In ten-year funds, LPs make commitments at the start of the fund’s life, but that capital is only put to work as it is called down through the duration of the fund’s distribution. Uncalled capital can’t be deployed in other assets, as LPs have to be able to meet all capital calls by the fund manager when required. In an interval fund capital is put to work straightway and fully invested in a portfolio of assets at the next trading date

The more liquid structure of an interval fund, meanwhile, has been particularly attractive as distributions from 10-year funds in LP portfolios have dried up. Interval funds have given institutional and non-institutional investors the option of drawing regular yield from their investment but also retain long-term exposure to private markets assets.

A flexible option

Interval funds have emerged as an attractive channel of non-institutional investment as the structure offers opportunities for investors to take liquidity at set times (either quarterly or monthly) as well as allowing investors to invest on daily basis, in the same way as they would in a mutual fund, rather than having to wait for a manager to come to market with a new fund every five years.

It is important for investors to understand, however, the interval funds are not liquid in the same way as stocks or mutual funds, where you can take liquidity on daily basis. Interval funds only offer the option to take redemptions during pre-agreed windows, and these redemptions will typically be limited at around five percent of the interval fund’s net asset value (NAV) at the time of redemption.

But while interval funds are not designed to be traded or present daily liquidity, they do give investors, particularly non-institutional investors, the comfort that their capital is not entirely locked up should they need cash in case of emergencies or life events such as divorce or illness.

The right rails

For managers managing, or seeking to manage, interval funds, it is essential to have the right operational rails in place to manage interval vehicles effectively. The infrastructure that GPs use to raise and manage 10-year funds is different to what is required to oversee interval funds.

Interval funds demand a capable back-office that can operate scale to meet the compliance, reporting and portfolio construction aspects of running these vehicles.

Managers have to have the bandwidth to support potentially hundreds of non—institutional investors in an interval fund, as opposed to relatively small group of institutional LPs in a 10-year fund, and understand the specific compliance, know-your-client (KYC), anti-money laundering (AML) and tax rules as they apply to non-institutional clients.

Managers also have to ensure that their back-offices are able to cope with the additional reporting and portfolio modelling requirements of interval funds. Publishing quarterly or monthly NAV figures to facilitate redemption windows, and the associated reporting, will be step up for managers new to the interval fund market.

Portfolio modelling is also more complex, with managers leaning on real time data from the back and mid-office to calculate what portion of a fund should be held in liquidity sleeves, and what cash will be generated by the portfolio naturally, in order to cover upcoming redemption requests.

Indeed, interval fund portfolios will be structured to include mix private markets assets, such as secondaries and private credit, to ensure that there is always some cash flowing back into the fund. Calculating liquidity requirements and modelling the ideal portfolio construction demands a large and sophisticated back-office function.

The staffing and technology costs that come with handling these obligations are significant and will involve large sums of capital expenditure.

Working with an experienced, tech-enabled fund administration partner, that has the scale and digital infrastructure to absorb the reporting and data demands that come with running interval funds, offers a cost-effective option for managers moving into the interval funds space.

Taking advantage of the large upswing in interval fund AUM, and the opportunity the structure provides to penetrate the non-institutional investor base will not only require front-office investment management pedigree, but also a resilient and robust back-office capability.

Insights

architecture buildings curved bridge scaled
EventsAugust 20, 2025

ANREV Australia Conference 2025

Creative professional business people working on business project in office
AnalysisAugust 7, 2025

How Private Equity Funds are Structured

man at event
AnalysisAugust 7, 2025

How Private Equity Waterfalls Work

Analysis

Private markets pioneers: a natural evolution – the growth of evergreen funds

Despite a slowdown in private markets fundraising, capital flows into evergreen fund structures are on the up

In the second of a five-part series, Alter Domus explores the reasons behind forecasts for double-digit growth in evergreen assets under management (AUM), and why institutional investors in particular are funneling more capital into evergreen fund structures.


architecture buildings clouds

Despite double-digit declines in annual private markets fundraising, the outlook for investment in evergreen fund structures is bright.

Evergreen funds (open-ended funds that do not have a fixed fund life, allowing investors to enter or exit at their discretion) have been around for decades, but have seen a surge in popularity during the last five years as investors have recognized the flexible liquidity and immediate market exposure they offer for alternative assets portfolios.

The momentum behind evergreen interest has been particularly strong during the last 24 months as fundraising for traditional, close-ended 10-years funds has cooled off and private markets managers and investors have sought alternative routes for securing and allocating capital.

The growing focus across private markets on raising more funding from the non-institutional investors has been a further spur for growth in evergreen fund assets under management (AUM), as evergreens provide family offices and individual investors with the opportunities to build exposure to private markets strategies at lower investment minimums (starting at $25,000 versus the typical $5 million minimum for a 10-year, close-ended fund) and periodic opportunities to take liquidity.

A natural evolution

The rise and rise of evergreen fund structures is a natural evolution for a private markets asset class that has ambitions to expand its investor base beyond its institutional core.

According to Hamilton Lane, evergreen funds currently account for just 5 percent of overall private markets AUM, which represents close to US$700 billion. Ten years on from now, however, Hamilton Lane anticipates that evergreens will account for at least 20 percent of total private markets AUM, with growth in allocations from high-net worth individual investors the key driver of the rise, as evergreen fund AUM growth outstrips that of 10-year funds.

Forecast growth for evergreen AUM, however, will not be driven exclusively by non-institutional channels, with Hamilton Lane expecting institutional investors to also increase their investment in evergreen structures as a tool for fine-tuning and managing private assets portfolios.

The liquidity optionality offered by evergreen funds has become particularly attractive for institutions during the last 24 months as interest rate dislocation has made it difficult for managers to exit portfolio assets at attractive valuations, leading to a slowdown in distributions back to investors. According to Bain & Co, distributions as a portion of net asset value (NAV) fell to just 11 percent in 2024 – the lowest rate in more than a decade.

Investors have had the option of taking liquidity through LP-led and GP-led secondaries deals but have often had to bear a discount to NAV when doing so. The opportunity that evergreen funds provide to offer some liquidity on a monthly or quarterly basis, at NAV, has appealed to institutions.

Long-term appeal

The appeal of evergreen structures, however, hasn’t only been supported by short-term, cyclical liquidity concerns.

Both institutional and non-institutional investors have also been attracted to other features of evergreen funds, perhaps most notably the time in the market that evergreens can offer.

In traditional 10-year funds large sums of capital have to be committed upfront, but as these funds are blind pool investment vehicles, those commitments are not put to work in assets on day one, but drawn down and invested over the investment period of the fund – usually five years.

Evergreen funds, however, will already be comprised of a core portfolio of assets, that investors will be fully invested as soon as they invest in the fund, providing much more scope to benefit from compounding returns.

Enabling investors to be fully invested from day one has a significant positive impact on the returns an evergreen structure is able to produce.

An analysis of the annualized returns generated by 13 equity-focused evergreen funds from Q3 2019 to Q3 2024 by Hamilton Lane found that evergreens outperformed both the MSCI Word Stock Market Index and all of private equity.

Hamilton Lane illustrates that an evergreen fund that generates a steady (but not spectacular) 12 per cent return over ten years will provide investors with a 2.5 times multiple on invested capital inside a decade. Only six percent of close-ended funds deliver the same money multiple, and have to produce IRRs of more than 20 percent to do so. Capital allocated to evergreen funds and fully invested on day one generates strong comparative money multiples without having to produce knockout returns.

Fee benefits

Fee and carry costs for evergreen funds also compare favorably to those of close-ended funds.

Management fees for the two types of fund structure come out roughly the same for the two structures after a 10-year period, according to Hamilton Lane, with closed-ended fund fees higher earlier in the fund life as capital is deployed during the investment period, and tapering off towards the end of the fund’s life, while evergreen fund management are spread out evenly through a ten-year period.

When factoring in carried interest costs, however, overall fund costs for evergreen funds come in lower than close-ended funds, with evergreen carry charged at around 15 percent and closed-ended fund carry holding at around 20 percent.

As more evergreen funds launch and competition for investor capital intensifies, fees for evergreen funds could come down further, particularly as more price-conscious individual investors invest growing sums in private markets evergreens.

A fund structure for the future

The closed-ended fund structure will remain an important pathway for capital deployment, but will not be the only route to private markets exposure in the future as non-institutional investors account for an ever-greater share of the investor base and institutional investors take advantage of the flexibility that evergreen funds offer for accessing liquidity and managing portfolios.

The uptick in evergreen fund launches is only just beginning.

Learn more about Alter Domus’ fund administration services

Alter Domus has significantly expanded its capabilities to support the administration of open-ended private market funds, including evergreen structures. This development aligns with the growing demand from institutional and retail investors for greater liquidity and flexibility in alternative investments.

Alter Domus has enhanced its open-ended fund administration by enabling more frequent NAV calculations and streamlined liquidity management, allowing fund managers to better meet investor redemption and subscription needs. Leveraging the Temenos Multifonds platform, the firm automates essential processes such as capital calls, valuations, and distributions, while integrating with financial networks like SWIFT and NSCC to improve settlement efficiency. It also offers comprehensive transfer agency services—acting directly in Luxembourg and partnering with providers in North America and the UK to manage diverse distribution channels. Additionally, Alter Domus has strengthened its investor reporting and regulatory compliance capabilities, including support for evolving frameworks like ELTIF 2.0.

The expansion of Alter Domus’ services reflects a broader industry trend toward the democratization of private markets. Regulatory changes in the EU, US, and UK are broadening access to private market investments, leading to increased demand for fund structures that offer liquidity and flexibility. Alter Domus’ enhanced capabilities position it to meet these evolving needs, supporting both traditional institutional clients and a growing base of retail investors.  By leveraging advanced technology and comprehensive services, Alter Domus enables fund managers to efficiently administer open-ended and evergreen fund structures, aligning with the industry’s shift toward more accessible and flexible investment vehicles.

image of key to unlock open-ended funds

Services

Open-ended Fund Administration

While they offer significant opportunities, OEF characteristics also come with enhanced commitments. Marry these with the nuances of alternative asset classes and you need experts to unlock the opportunity.

Insights

architecture buildings curved bridge scaled
EventsAugust 20, 2025

ANREV Australia Conference 2025

Creative professional business people working on business project in office
AnalysisAugust 7, 2025

How Private Equity Funds are Structured

man at event
AnalysisAugust 7, 2025

How Private Equity Waterfalls Work

Analysis

The growth of the private debt market: Trends, opportunities, and challenges

Explore the growth of the private debt market, including key opportunities & challenges.


architecture sky scrapers scaled

Over the last two decades, private credit has grown exponentially to become one of the most important lending sources, particularly for those that do not meet the lending criteria of traditional banks.

At the same time, private credit as an asset class has captured the attention of institutional investors seeking new avenues for growth and portfolio diversification in debt assets outside of the public credit space. To better understand the distinctions and strategic implications, it’s important to explore the key differences between private credit vs. public credit.

In this guide, we’ll explore the evolution of the private credit market, the key trends shaping its future, the opportunities it presents, and the challenges that participants must navigate as they engage with this rapidly expanding sector.

Private debt market 101: What it is and how it works

Private credit, also called private debt, refers to corporate lending that takes place outside the traditional banking system and public markets.

Unlike public credit instruments like corporate bonds, which are issued and traded on the open market, private debt is negotiated privately between the lender and borrowers. The lenders in this market include private debt funds, asset management firms, and business development companies, while borrowers are primarily SMEs and middle-market firms.

There are several types of public debt, including the following:

Direct lending

This is where lenders provide credit, usually in the form of senior secured loans, directly to borrowers. Direct lending is the most common type of private debt, accounting for about 44% of overall assets under management (AUM).

Mezzanine debt:

This is a form of debt that combines elements of both debt and equity. Specifically, it includes features like warrants or convertible securities, which give lenders the right to convert their debt into equity under certain conditions or circumstances, like in default scenarios. In the capital structure, mezzanine debt sits beneath senior debt and offers higher returns to compensate for the increased risk.

Distressed debt

This is a type of private debt investing that involves purchasing the debt of financially troubled companies at a discount, with the aim of profiting from a restructuring or recovery of the company..

Special situations

This is a broad category that includes tailored debt solutions for unique events, such as restructurings, recapitalizations, or transitional ownership changes.

The primary return for private debt lenders is interest income, which tends to be higher than what would be offered by public credit markets. However, as seen above, depending on the type of debt, lenders may also receive equity-linked instruments, which allow them to participate in and benefit from the future upside of the business. Furthermore, many private debt deals include fees for structuring or managing the loan, which offers an additional layer of return for lenders.

For borrowers, the primary benefit of private debt financing is that it offers an alternative source of capital besides traditional bank financing. Furthermore, private credit offers more flexibility. Borrowers can structure financing in ways that better align with their cash flow cycles, operational timelines, or specific growth objectives.

A brief history of the private debt market’s evolution

While private credit has been around for some time, its significance has grown considerably over the last 15 years, particularly in the wake of the 2007-2008 global financial crisis.

As banks retreated from riskier lending due to new regulations, a financing gap emerged in the market, particularly for middle-market companies that were now finding it increasingly hard to secure debt financing from banks. Concurrently, yield-seeking investors, grappling with historically low interest rates in public markets, began exploring alternative investment strategies.

Private debt emerged as the perfect solution, offering institutional investors the potential for stable cash flows at premium rates while providing middle-market businesses with a much-needed financing alternative to commercial bank loans.

Today, the private debt market has become a big part of the global financial system, with assets under management reaching record levels. The global private debt market is currently valued at $1.8 trillion, a significant jump from just over $300 billion in 2010. Projections suggest it will grow to $2.64. trillion by 2028

Furthermore, the addressable market for private credit in the United States alone is estimated at a staggering $30 trillion, highlighting the immense growth potential within this asset class.

As the private debt market matures, several key trends are shaping its future. These trends reflect both the evolving needs of borrowers and investors, and broader economic shifts.

Specialization in niche sectors

One of the most prominent trends in the private debt space is a shift toward specialization. Lenders, such as private debt funds, are increasingly targeting niche sectors such as healthcare, technology, infrastructure, and renewable energy.

This specialization allows lenders to cultivate deep expertise, enabling more accurate risk and opportunity assessments compared to generalist investors. This translates to enhanced investment decisions and more effective risk mitigation strategies.

Additionally, niche sectors often present opportunities for higher returns due to market inefficiencies or a lack of competition from traditional lenders. Many niche sectors are underserved by traditional banks, creating opportunities for private debt lenders to fill the financing gap. This can foster strong relationships with borrowers in these sectors and lead to a consistent flow of investment opportunities.

ESG investing in private debt

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors are becoming more prominent in private debt investing. This is driven by increasing demand from investors who want to align their portfolio with sustainable and ethical business practices.

For private lenders, such as private debt funds, this trend presents an opportunity to differentiate themselves by offering specialized funding solutions that prioritize sustainable and socially responsible projects. It provides a chance to potentially unlock new pools of capital from institutional investors with ESG mandates.

For borrowers, the new trend presents new opportunities to access flexible, mission-aligned financing. Borrowers with strong ESG credentials may benefit from better lending terms or faster access to capital, especially when they can demonstrate measurable impact and outcomes.

Technology integration in private credit lending

Advancements in technology are reshaping how private debt is sourced, underwritten, and managed. For example, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and data analytics are enabling more efficient and precise credit risk assessment and streamlining everyday fund operations. This is lowering the operational costs of lenders, which can enhance returns for investors.

Banks entering the private credit space

Another emerging trend within the private debt market is the growing involvement of traditional banks.  Recognizing the immense potential of private debt, many banks are either starting their own private credit divisions or forming collaborative partnerships with alternative lenders to both gain access to this growing market, and better serve their customers by offering more flexible financing solutions.

Key opportunities in the private market

The current economic landscape presents several compelling opportunities that private debt lenders can take advantage of to create value for their stakeholders. 

Providing junior and hybrid capital solutions

In the current high-interest environment, many fundamentally sound businesses now face constrained senior debt capacity due to increased debt servicing requirements. This creates an opportunity for private debt investors to provide junior or hybrid capital (like mezzanine debt or unitranche loans), which can help companies meet their debt obligations while giving them the flexibility to pursue growth initiatives.

In turn, private lenders get to enjoy higher yields due to the subordinated nature of the debt.

Financing growth quality companies

As equity and public market investors have shifted focus from growth-at-all-costs to profitability, a significant funding gap has emerged for scaling businesses with strong fundamentals.

Private credit providers are well-positioned to fill this void by offering tailored growth capital solutions. This allows highly promising companies to fund expansion without excessive equity dilution, while providing lenders with the possibility of enhanced returns through equity participation features, such as warrants.

Capitalizing on rescue financing opportunities

As the possibility of a recession looms, businesses may find themselves in need of rescue financing. This could be particularly relevant if companies face a liquidity crisis, but their underlying fundamentals remain strong.

For private debt investors, these situations represent an opportunity to step in with tailored financing solutions that can stabilize businesses. Providing capital to distressed companies can yield substantial returns, particularly when coupled with effective restructuring and turnaround strategies.

Challenges faced by private debt market participants

While private credit offers numerous advantages and attractive opportunities for participants, it also presents numerous risks that can affect the profitability and sustainability of investments.

 Let’s dissect the three most pressing challenges that private debt market participants must consider.

Regulatory risks

One of the most significant challenges facing private debt market participants is an evolving regulatory landscape. Private debt markets are generally less regulated than public debt markets, but as the sector continues to grow, regulators are increasingly turning their attention to the space.

Introduction of new regulations or changes to existing ones could impact the terms and conditions of private credit transactions. For example, stricter capital requirements or limitations on the types of loans that can be issued could reduce the availability of certain private debt investments, potentially leading to lower returns or fewer investment opportunities. Moreover, increased scrutiny from regulators can cause higher compliance costs for lenders such as private debt funds, which may be passed on to investors.

The lack of uniform regulations across different regions and jurisdictions adds another layer of complexity. What is permissible in one market may not be in another, making it difficult for private debt funds to operate smoothly on a global scale. This regulatory uncertainty can be a source of concern for both investors and borrowers, as it introduces an element of unpredictability into the market.

Illiquidity risks

Unlike publicly traded bonds or stocks, private debt investments are often illiquid, meaning they cannot be easily bought or sold on secondary markets. Once an investor commits capital to a private debt fund, for example, the investment is typically locked in for several years. This illiquidity can be a challenge for investors who need access to capital before the loan matures or the fund exits its investments.

In addition, the illiquid nature of private debt investments means that investors may have fewer opportunities to adjust their portfolios should market conditions or their investment objectives change.

Credit risk and market volatility

Another major challenge facing private debt market participants is credit risk and market volatility. Credit risk refers to the likelihood that a borrower may default on its debt obligations. This risk is particularly relevant in private debt, as many of the borrowers are smaller or less established companies with higher risk profiles.

Market volatility can exacerbate the default risk, as economic fluctuations, changing interest rates, or sector-specific downturns can negatively impact a borrower’s ability to repay its debt. For example, during an economic recession, companies may experience lower revenues or higher operational costs, which can strain their ability to meet loan obligations. In these scenarios, private debt investors may face higher default rates, reduced returns, or even the loss of their principal investment.

To mitigate these risks, private debt investors should conduct thorough due diligence, include relevant covenant protections in their lending agreements, and practice diversification across borrowers, debt instruments, and geographies.

The private debt market has seen exceptional growth in recent years, with institutional investors increasingly turning to it as a way to diversify their portfolios and achieve steady, attractive returns. For borrowers, this market offers a valuable, flexible alternative to traditional financing options.

However, while the benefits and opportunities are abundant, investors must be mindful of the risks involved and implement relevant mitigation strategies to minimize potential downsides.

At Alter Domus, we specialize in supporting fund and asset managers in the private debt space. With our expertise and advanced private debt solutions, we empower you to make more informed decisions, manage risks effectively, and optimize your investment operations.

Reach out to our team today to learn how our private debt solutions can help you unlock the full potential of this highly promising market and stay ahead of the curve.


Analysis

Private debt financing vs bank lenders: How the market is evolving

Explore how private debt financing is evolving and competing with traditional bank lenders.


man in boardroom staring out of window

Corporate lending was once the exclusive domain of commercial banks. However, over the last one and a half decades, a combination of economic shifts, market disruptions, regulatory reforms, and a growing hunger among investors for higher yields have catalyzed the rise of an alternative form of corporate funding known as private debt, or private credit.

Today, private debt is one of the most important components of the global business financing space.

This article looks at the growing influence of private debt financing and how it stacks up against traditional bank lending. We’ll look at why businesses are increasingly turning to it, the benefit it offers to both borrowers and lenders, and the strategies that banks are employing to stay competitive as private debt increasingly challenges their market dominance.

What is private debt financing?

Private debt financing refers to loans or credit extended to businesses by lenders who operate outside the traditional banking system. These are collectively known as non-bank lenders, and include private debt funds, asset management firms, and business development companies.

The returns for these non-bank lenders and their investors come primarily from interest payments on the loans they issue. These loans typically carry higher interest rates than traditional bank loans or publicly traded bonds. The higher rate reflects the added risks lenders take on, including the fact that private loans are typically illiquid (they can’t be easily sold or traded), and that borrowers are often small to mid-sized companies that may have less predictable cash flow or weaker credit profiles

The rise of private debt financing: A short history

Although private debt has existed in various forms for decades, its role in the financial ecosystem significantly expanded following the 2008 financial crisis.

As banks grappled with heightened regulatory scrutiny and capital constraints in the aftermath of the crisis, many scaled back their corporate lending activities. This created a vacuum in the market, particularly for middle-market companies, which were now deemed too risky for banks to lend to.

Recognizing this void, non-bank lenders quickly moved in to fill the gap, offering more flexible, accessible financing solutions to businesses that would have otherwise struggled to secure funding. 

Since then, private debt as an asset class has grown a lot. Currently, the global private debt market is valued at over $1.8 trillion (from just over $300 billion in 2010), with Preqin estimating it will reach $2.64 trillion by 2029.

The continued appetite and demand for private credit is driven by its appeal to businesses looking for financing alternatives to bank loans, and hunger among investors for yields that outpace traditional fixed-income investments.

Comparing private debt financing and bank lending

Let’s look at the primary differences between private debt.

Source of capital

As mentioned, lenders such as private debt funds and asset management firms that operate outside the traditional banking system issue private debt. These entities typically raise capital from institutional investors (such as pension funds, insurance companies, endowments, family offices, and high-net-worth individuals) with the specific mandate to grow it through investments like private debt. Since private lenders are not deposit-taking institutions, they are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as banks.

Traditional bank financing, by contrast, comes from regulated financial institutions, such as commercial banks and credit unions. These lenders use funds from customer deposits to issue loans and, as such, are subject to strict financial regulations that greatly shape how they assess credit risk and limit the types of loans they can issue.

Loan structure and flexibility

Private debt offers greater flexibility in structuring loans. Terms such as repayment schedules, covenants, interest types, and amortization are negotiated directly between the borrower and lender and thus can be tailored to their specific needs, circumstances, and preferences.

In contrast, traditional bank loans follow more standardized terms. Because banks must follow regulatory requirements and internal risk guidelines, the loan products they offer tend to be more rigid. Borrowers must meet predefined credit criteria, and there is usually less room for customization of the loan terms and structure.

Type of borrowers served

Private credit tends to serve riskier borrowers, or those who have more complex or unique financial needs, such as mid-market companies, private equity-backed firms, or those in high-growth sectors. These borrowers often struggle to meet the stringent requirements of traditional banks, particularly when it comes to having an established credit history or meeting certain size, cashflow or profitability thresholds.

In contrast, traditional banks generally serve larger, well-established companies with strong credit ratings, consistent financials, and a stable operating history.

Price of capital

The price of capital for private debt is generally higher than traditional bank financing. Private lenders charge higher interest rates and fees to offset the increased risk they are taking on, as mentioned earlier.

The price of capital from traditional banks is typically lower due to their lower risk exposure and regulated status.

Benefits of private debt financing

For borrowers

  • Access to capital: Private debt provides an alternative for businesses that may not qualify for traditional bank loans. And for those who can still qualify for commercial bank loans, it allows them to diversify their sources of capital and reduce reliance on banks.
  • Flexibility in terms: Private debt allows for customized loan structures, as we have seen, including repayment schedules, interest rates, and covenants. This flexibility helps businesses better align financing with their unique needs and cash flow situations.
  • Speed and efficiency: Private debt deals can be processed faster than traditional bank financing (due to fewer regulations). This can give companies faster access to capital when time is critical.

For lenders

  • Attractive returns: Private debt typically offers higher yields than other traditional fixed-income investments like public market bonds, making it an attractive option for lenders seeking superior returns on capital.
  • Diversification and low correlation to public markets: Private debt allows funds and asset managers to diversify their portfolios beyond just traditional equity or public credit. Since private debt is not publicly traded, its performance is typically less correlated to public market fluctuations. Therefore, it can provide stability during periods of market downturns.
  • Control and customization: The flexibility of private credit enables lenders to structure deals that better align with their desired outcomes and risk tolerance.

How banks are competing with private debt lenders

As private debt financing continues to gain traction, traditional banks are stepping up their game. Rather than ceding ground to non-bank lenders, banks are evolving their strategies to remain competitive and better serve the shifting needs of borrowers.

Prioritizing efficiency and speed

To match the agility of private debt firms, banks are focusing on improving the efficiency and speed of their lending processes. While regulatory frameworks limit how much banks can alter their lending models, they are finding ways to accelerate deal timelines and enhance borrower experiences. Many are streamlining approval processes, offering faster credit decisions, and creating more responsive loan servicing models.

A key driver behind these improvements is technology. For example, banks are increasingly leveraging AI and machine learning to assess credit risk more accurately and automate key parts of the underwriting workflow, resulting in quicker and more efficient loan approvals.

Developing in-house private credit capabilities

Recognizing the strong demand for private credit, major banks are building their own private lending operations. Big banks like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and JPMorgan Chase all offer a private debt practice. These internal platforms allow banks to directly participate in the high-growth private debt space, while leveraging their existing client relationships and financial infrastructure.

Partnering with private debt firms

Rather than going head-to-head with private credit lenders, some banks are choosing to partner or collaborate with them. By forming co-lending partnerships with private debt lenders, banks can pool resources and expertise to offer larger, more flexible financing solutions. These partnerships enable banks to maintain a foothold in the private debt market without needing to create their own private credit offerings from scratch. 

Final thoughts: Private debt financing vs bank lenders

The corporate lending landscape has evolved significantly since the 2008 financial crisis, with private debt becoming a key alternative to traditional bank loans. Offering flexibility, speed, and tailored solutions – including asset based loans – this form of debt funding has become increasingly attractive, particularly to businesses with unique financing needs or that don’t meet the criteria of traditional banks.

Meanwhile, for fund and asset managers, private credit offers an opportunity to deliver significantly higher yields than what is possible with other fixed-income instruments. For a broader perspective on how this asset class compares to its public market counterpart, explore our article on private credit vs. public credit.

As a leading provider of private debt solutions, Alter Domus offers the operational infrastructure and support fund and asset managers need to execute and manage private debt strategies with efficiency and ease.

Visit our Private Debt Solutions page to learn more about how Alter Domus can help you better capitalize on the growth of private debt financing and achieve your goals.


Analysis

Private credit vs. public credit: Understanding the key differences and benefits

Understand the difference between private and public credit, including the benefits of each option.


group at event

Private credit and public credit represent two distinct segments of the global credit market. While both serve the same fundamental purpose, which is to provide capital to borrowers while generating consistent returns for investors, they differ significantly in structure, accessibility, and their risk and return profile.

In this private credit vs public credit comparison guide, we’ll break down how the two asset classes stack up against one another so investors and borrowers alike can decide which is the better option for their needs and circumstances.

Understanding private and public credit

What is private credit?

Private credit refers to corporate lending that takes place outside the traditional banking system and public markets. It occurs between private investors and companies that prefer not to issue debt publicly. Non-bank lenders such as private debt funds, asset management firms, and business development companies (BDCs) often provide this type of credit.

Private credit is most commonly used by SMEs or middle-market firms that may have problems securing commercial bank loans due to their size, credit profile, or complex business models. Transactions are typically negotiated privately and often feature customized terms tailored to the specific needs of both the lender and the borrower.

As an asset class, private credit has gained popularity in recent years, particularly among middle-market companies looking for customized financing solutions and investors seeking higher yields than what’s currently being offered by bank loans and public debt, fueling the rapid expansion of the private debt market.

What is public credit?

Public credit refers to debt instruments, such as corporate bonds, that are issued and traded on public markets.

Larger, more established companies seeking capital from a wide pool of investors generally offer these instruments. Public credit is subject to extensive regulatory oversight, and details such as interest rates and maturity dates are publicly disclosed and accessible through open markets.

Private credit vs public credit: Key differences

Let’s look at some key differences between private and public credit.

Investor access

Public credit is available to both institutional and retail investors through platforms like bond markets or mutual funds. In contrast, private credit is generally limited to institutional investors such as private debt funds, mainly due to high minimum investment thresholds and the fact that there’s no open market for this asset class..

Standardization vs customization

Public debt instruments are typically standardized. This standardization allows for efficient trading and widespread accessibility. However, it also limits the ability to tailor loan terms to the specific needs of individual borrowers.

Private credit, on the other hand, offers greater customization. Loans can be structured to meet borrowers’ unique requirements, including flexible repayment schedules. For instance, a growing company seeking financing for a specific project might require a loan with a unique repayment structure that aligns with its projected cash flows. Private credit lenders can accommodate such needs.

Transparency and regulation

Public credit is highly regulated. Issuers are required to disclose financials, credit ratings, and material updates on a regular basis, which translates to high transparency for investors. 

Private credit operates in a more opaque environment. Detailed financial information may not be publicly accessible, and valuation may rely on third-party assessments. This lack of transparency increases the complexity of analyzing and monitoring private credit investments.

Liquidity

Public credit boasts high liquidity, meaning it’s relatively easy for investors to exit their investments. Private credit, on the other hand, is highly illiquid. There’s limited secondary market activity for the latter, and investors must be ready to commit their capital for multiple years (typically 5-10 years).

Risk and return profile

Private credit tends to carry higher risks than its public counterpart. This is primarily due to lower liquidity in private credit instruments. Additionally, private credit deals often involve smaller, less-established companies, which can increase the potential for default. To compensate for these increased risks, private credit typically offers higher yields.

Conversely, the yields of public credit are lower due to its higher liquidity and the fact that it generally involves lending to larger, more established firms, which have a lower risk of default.

Benefits of private credit

Private credit offers several benefits for both investors and borrowers.

Investors

For investors, the biggest benefit of private credit is the potential for enhanced returns. As mentioned, this asset class offers higher yields to compensate for its illiquidity and the overall higher risk of investments. For example, while investment-grade corporate bonds may yield 3–6%, private credit strategies (such as direct lending or mezzanine financing) often deliver 8–12% or more in annual returns. The Cliffwater Direct Lending Index (CDLI), for example, returned 12.13% in 2023 and has delivered a 9.55% annualized total return since its inception in 2004.

The other benefit is diversification. Private credit allows investors and managers to diversify their portfolios beyond just traditional equity or public debt. It has low correlation to public markets and can therefore act as a hedge against market volatility.

Finally, private credit allows investors to negotiate and tailor debt arrangements to align with their specific risk and return objectives.

Borrowers

Private credit provides a crucial source of capital for borrowers who may face challenges securing financing from traditional sources like banks. In particular, private debt financing enables businesses to structure deals quickly and confidentially, often on terms that align more closely with their unique operational and financial needs.

Private debt deals can also be completed faster, which is especially valuable in time-sensitive situations. Furthermore, unlike public debt, which requires detailed disclosures, private debt transactions are typically confidential. This allows borrowers to avoid disclosing sensitive information, which could impact their competitive position or market perception.

Benefits of public credit

Just like private credit, private credit also has its benefits for both investors and creditors.

Investors

Since public credit instruments, like corporate and government bonds, can be traded easily in secondary markets, this allows for quicker investor portfolio adjustments in response to changing market conditions or investment objectives.

Additionally, public disclosure requirements associated with public credit instruments make it easier to assess the relative value and potential worthiness of an investment.

Borrowers

For borrowers, public credit markets enable businesses to raise large amounts of capital efficiently from a broad investor base. Additionally, successfully issuing and managing public credit can enhance a borrower’s credibility, visibility, and creditworthiness in the eyes of stakeholders. The transparency and oversight involved can signal to the market that the company is financially sound and can meet its obligations.

Finally, for investment-grade issuers, the cost of capital in public markets is typically lower than private debt due to the lower perceived risk from public scrutiny and the liquidity offered to investors.

Final thoughts: Choosing between private credit and public credit

Private and public credit play important roles in the debt financing ecosystem. But as seen, they offer quite different value propositions for both investors and borrowers. Private credit stands out for its flexibility and potential for higher returns. It appeals to long-term investors willing to accept illiquidity and higher risk for the chance of greater rewards.

On the other hand, public credit offers greater liquidity, accessibility and a lower-risk profile. It is a better fit for investors who prioritize ease of entry and exit, transparency, and standardized terms.

Ultimately, choosing between private and public credit comes down to your investment objectives, risk appetite, and time horizon. By understanding what each option brings to the table, you can make more informed decisions and build a well-balanced credit strategy. Many sophisticated investors choose to incorporate both into their portfolios to balance risk and maximize returns.

For fund or asset managers looking to unlock the full potential of private credit, Alter Domus offers specialized solutions that support every stage of the private credit lifecycle, from fund structuring and loan administration to data analytics and investor reporting.

Get in touch with Alter Domus to learn how our private debt solutions and services can support your investment goals and help you create more value for your investors.

Analysis

Private debt funds: An in-depth guide

Learn how private debt funds work and the role of debt asset management.


colleagues sitting on red chairs scaled

Private debt has become one of the fastest-growing segments of the alternative investment landscape. Once considered a very niche strategy, it has slowly gained mainstream acceptance, particularly among institutional and other sophisticated investors seeking higher yields and greater control over risk compared to traditional debt markets and other alternative asset classes, like private equity or venture capital.

The increased appetite and acceptance has led to a spike in private debt finds launched.

In this guide, we’ll tell you everything you need to know about private debt funds including how they operate, how they are structured, and some of the key strategies they employ to manage risk and generate value for investors.

What is a private debt fund?

Private debt, also known as private credit, refers to the provision of debt financing to borrowers through channels other than traditional banking institutions or public markets. So rather than securing loans from banks or issuing publicly-traded bonds, businesses borrow the funds needed to support growth, refinance existing debt or fund acquisitions and current operations from private lenders. Understanding the differences between private credit vs. public credit is essential to grasp how this asset class fits into a diversified investment strategy.

One of the primary sources of this type of lending is private debt funds. These are pooled investment vehicles that gather capital from a range of investors, including institutional investors (such as pension funds, insurance companies, and endowments) and high-net-worth individuals. The fund then strategically deploys this pooled capital to provide diverse forms of debt financing to companies.

Unlike public credit investment vehicles, which are traded on open markets, private debt is privately negotiated between the lender (the private debt fund) and the borrower (the company). This allows the lender and borrower to tailor the terms of the loan or debt facility to the specific needs of both parties.

Returns for investors in private debt funds primarily come from interest payments on the fund’s portfolio of loans. The rates charged depend on factors such as the borrower’s creditworthiness, the type of debt issued, and the prevailing market conditions.

But generally, the illiquid nature of private debt and the fact that they are typically extended to borrowers with more complex financing needs, such as middle-market companies or those lacking access to conventional financing, means they typically command higher rates to compensate for the higher risk and/or custom terms.

What’s more, most private debt also comes with a floating rate that’s pegged to a base rate, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), which offers investors potential protection against rising interest rates.

Private debt funds rose to prominence following the 2008 global financial crisis. As banks came under tighter regulatory scrutiny and adopted more conservative lending practices, a financing gap emerged, particularly for middle-market firms and other businesses with riskier credit profiles.

Private debt funds stepped in to fill this void, positioning themselves as a vital alternative to traditional lending.

In the years following the financial crisis, persistently low interest rates (that meant low yields on traditional bonds and savings products) further pushed investors towards private debt as an alternative.

The end result has been exponential growth in this sector. Private debt assets under management have surged from just over $300 billion in 2010 to over $1.8 trillion currently. According to Preqin, this figure is projected to reach $2.64 trillion by 2029.

Benefits of private debt

Let’s look at some of the primary benefits of private debt for investors.

  • Potential for enhanced returns: Private debt often offers the potential for higher risk-adjusted returns compared to traditional fixed-income investments. This is largely due to what’s known as the illiquidity premium, which is the additional return investors demand and receive for holding assets that cannot be easily sold or traded in the short term. Since private debt investments are typically long-term and not publicly traded, investors are compensated with higher yields.
  • Diversification benefits: Private debt offers portfolio diversification by providing access to an asset class that tends to behave differently from publicly traded investments. They can act as a stabilizing force against market volatility in a broader investment portfolio.
  • Customization and risk control: Managers of private debt funds possess greater control over the terms of the loans they originate. This enhanced control allows them to better manage credit risk and tailor each investment to specifically meet the fund’s desired risk-return profile.

Types of private debt funds

Private debt funds come in various forms. Let’s look at the most common types.

Direct lending funds

Direct lending is the most common form of private debt, accounting for about 44% of overall assets under management (AUM).  It involves providing loans directly to middle-market companies. These loans usually take the form of senior secured debt, meaning they are backed by the borrower’s assets and have priority in repayment if default occurs. However, they can also take other forms, such as unitranche loans (combining senior and subordinated debt). 

Distressed debt funds

These funds invest in the debts of companies facing financial difficulties. The objective here is to purchase debt at a discount, with the potential to realize significant gains if the company’s fortunes improve or through restructuring initiatives.

Mezzanine debt funds

Mezzanine debt is a hybrid form of financing that offers both debt and equity-like features (e.g., equity warrants or conversion rights). In the capital structure, it sits between senior debt and equity and therefore carries higher risk. Accordingly, mezzanine debt offers higher returns to compensate for this increased risk.

This type of debt is commonly used in leveraged buyouts and other acquisition financing. For corporate borrowers, mezzanine debt is attractive because it provides growth capital without diluting ownership significantly or imposing the restrictive covenants of senior loans.

Special situations

Special situations investing involves deploying debt capital in companies undergoing unusual or complex events that create opportunities for value realization. These events might include restructurings, asset sales, spin-offs, regulatory changes, or shareholder activism. Unlike distressed debt, which deals with troubled companies, special situations may involve fundamentally sound businesses facing temporary disruptions or strategic shifts.

The goal is to capitalize on the inefficiencies caused by these unique circumstances and profit when things settle down. The approach is highly opportunistic and requires deep due diligence and a hands-on style. However, the returns for special situations debt funds can be high due to limited competition and borrower urgency.

How private debt funds are structured and managed

Private debt funds are often set up as limited partnerships comprising two main stakeholders.

Limited Partners (LPs)

These are investors committing capital to the fund. As mentioned, they include institutional investors, like pension funds, insurance companies, and endowments, and high-net-worth individuals. LPs have limited liability, meaning their potential losses are typically capped at their investment amount.

General Partner (GP)

They are the fund managers. They are responsible for setting the fund’s strategic direction and overseeing its day-to-day operations, including sourcing deals, conducting due diligence, managing the portfolio, and ultimately exiting investments. The GPs have unlimited liability.

The relationship between LPs and the GPs is governed by a detailed Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA), which defines the investment strategy of the firm, the fee structure, and other important terms.

Besides the GPs and the LPs, there are several other players in a private debt fund who also play an important role. These include analysts and specialists who provide crucial support to the fund managers in evaluating and managing investments.

How private debt funds work

The investment process of a private debt fund involves the following steps.

Identifying investment opportunities

The first step in a private debt fund’s operation is sourcing deals, i.e., seeking potential entities needing private debt financing. This typically involves leveraging established relationships and networks with intermediaries such as investment banks, private equity funds, financial advisers, and business owners. In some cases, corporate borrowers may bring potential debt financing opportunities directly to the private debt fund.

Initial deal screening

Once a deal is identified, it undergoes initial screening to determine whether it fits the fund’s strategy and risk profile. At this stage, the investment team assesses the loan amount, purpose, borrower type, and broad financial metrics. Deals that don’t meet the basic criteria are quickly filtered out to focus resources on stronger candidates.

Creditworthiness assessment (risk & return evaluation)

This is one of the most critical steps in the process. The fund conducts a detailed evaluation of the borrower’s financial health, business model, and industry position. Key metrics such as cash flow stability, leverage, and collateral coverage are analyzed to understand the risk of default and the potential return.

This phase may also include scenario testing to assess how the borrower would perform under various stress conditions. The overarching goal here is to evaluate the risk-return tradeoff and determine whether the loan offers sufficient return relative to the risks involved.

Due diligence

If the borrower clears the credit assessment, the fund moves into due diligence. This involves validating the borrower’s financials, reviewing legal documentation, and evaluating any operational risks. The team may conduct site visits, consult external advisors, and review contracts or litigation history to ensure there are no hidden red flags.

Deal structuring

Once due diligence is complete, the next step is structuring the deal. This includes setting the interest rate, repayment schedule, financial covenants, and collateral requirements.

Investment committee approval

The proposed deal is then presented to the investment committee for final approval. The committee reviews the investment thesis, risk profile, and return expectations. If approved, the fund proceeds to legal execution and funding.

Execution and funding

Legal documents are finalized, and the capital is disbursed according to the agreed terms. The fund ensures the borrower complies with initial conditions and that all security interests are properly registered.

Ongoing monitoring

Post-investment, the fund closely monitors the borrower’s financial health and compliance with loan terms. This includes tracking timely interest payments, reviewing financial statements, and checking adherence to covenants. Missed or delayed interest payments can be an early signal of distress, prompting the fund to intervene or renegotiate terms. Active monitoring helps safeguard returns and ensures the portfolio remains on track.

These loan monitoring and administrative tasks are often referred to as middle office operations, and tend to be time-consuming, involved workflows that require in-depth knowledge of bespoke credit vehicles. Due to this, many private debt managers choose to outsource some or all of their middle office credit operations . Alter Domus offers services for any loan or fund operations task from such as loan agency or loan administration.

Key investment strategies for private debt funds

Private debt funds use several investment strategies to achieve their core objectives of generating consistent income, preserving capital, and delivering strong risk-adjusted returns for investors. Let’s break down the most notable strategies.

Sector-focused investing

Many private debt funds are increasingly adopting a sector-focused approach. Some sectors that are popular with private debt funds include real estate, technology, infrastructure, healthcare, and industrials. Focusing on specific sectors allows fund managers to build deep industry knowledge, build valuable networks, and better assess the risks and opportunities associated with potential borrowers.

Covenants and protections

Private debt funds often incorporate specific covenants in loan agreements. These covenants are designed to protect the lender’s investment and provide early warning signs if the borrower’s financial health begins to deteriorate. The two main types of covenants are:

  • Financial covenants: These, for example, may require borrowers to maintain certain leverage ratios or liquidity levels.
  • Operational covenants: These may include restrictions on asset sales, additional debt, or other business activities that could increase risk.

Diversification

Diversification is another key strategy that many funds use to achieve their objectives. Rather than concentrating capital in a few large positions, fund managers typically spread investments across multiple borrowers, industries, and geographies.

This approach limits the fund’s exposure to any single point of failure, be it a borrower default or regional economic shock.

Importantly, sector focus, which we looked at earlier, and diversification are not mutually exclusive. A fund may specialize in a few core sectors while still diversifying across different borrowers, deal sizes, geographies, and loan types. For example, a fund focused on infrastructure might diversify by investing in different sub-sectors (e.g., energy, transportation, and utilities) or by combining senior debt, subordinated debt, and unitranche structures.

The result of diversification is a more resilient portfolio; that is, one that’s better equipped to withstand cyclical shifts while delivering consistent, risk-adjusted returns over time.

Common questions about private debt funds

How liquid are private debt funds?

Unlike publicly traded stocks or bonds that can be bought and sold relatively easily on exchanges, private debt investments are generally considered illiquid. This means that it can be challenging for investors to sell their fund interests or the underlying debt holdings quickly and at a fair market price. In fact, most private debt funds are structured as closed-end funds with multi-year lock-up periods, typically ranging from five to ten years.

The illiquid nature of private debt is not inherently negative, however, as we’ve already seen. It’s often compensated by higher yields. But it does mean investors should carefully consider their own liquidity needs and investment horizon before committing capital.

Generally, private debt funds may be more suitable for investors with a long-term perspective, i.e., who do not require immediate access to their capital and are comfortable with it being committed for an extended period.

What are the fees and costs associated with private debt funds?

Like many other actively managed investment vehicles, private debt funds charge management and performance fees.

A typical structure includes a management fee of around 1% to 2% of committed capital, which covers operational and administrative costs. In addition, fund managers may earn a performance fee (or “carried interest”), of around 10% to 20% of profits, once a hurdle return is met, often in the range of 6% to 8%.

If there are any other fees or charges, they will be outlined in the fund’s LPA.

Final thoughts: Understanding private debt funds

Private debt funds have become a key part of the alternative investment space.  Their appeal to investors stems from the potential for strong risk-adjusted returns, greater control over deal terms, and a low correlation to public market movements. 

However, understanding the structure, operations, and strategies behind private debt funds is crucial for making informed investment decisions.

Overall, private debt can be a compelling option and a valuable addition to an investor’s portfolio, provided they are comfortable with longer investment horizons and limited liquidity.

For fund managers, success in the private debt market depends on not just being able to source quality deals but also having a strong operational backbone. Alter Domuscan help with the latter. We provide custom private debt solutions that streamline fund management, optimize operational efficiency, and support fund managers in navigating the complexities of the private credit markets.

Reach out today to learn more about how Alter Domus can support your private debt strategy.