
Analysis
How fund administration supports scaling-up venture capital operations
Every venture capital firm aspires to grow with time, whether that means raising larger funds, managing a broader portfolio, or expanding into new markets. However, growth often comes with increased operational complexity.
As the firm expands, managing critical tasks like capital calls and distributions, investor reporting, compliance, and governance in-house can start straining internal resources and divert attention from core fund priorities like sourcing deals and providing strategic support to portfolio companies.
In light of this, many VC firms are increasingly turning to professional fund administration. These services provide the expertise, systems and infrastructure that VC firms need to scale effectively, without sacrificing operational efficiency or affecting the ability to meet their obligations to investors and regulatory authorities.
In this guide, we’ll dive deeper into the role of fund administrators in helping VC firms scale, including the key functions these entities provide.

Challenges of scaling up venture capital operations
Before we get into how fund administration can enable more efficient scaling, let’s first look at three major operational challenges that many venture capital firms face as they expand their operations.
Increased fund complexity
Scaling a venture capital operation usually includes either launching more funds, managing larger funds, or structuring funds in increasingly complex ways. All these changes add operational strain to the firm.
- Increased number of funds: Managing multiple funds, each with its own investment focus, lifecycle, and mandate, creates a higher administrative burden. More funds require more resources to ensure each operates smoothly and in line with its objectives.
- Larger funds: Bigger funds demand more disciplined capital deployment, enhanced reporting, and a stronger internal team to manage investor relations.
- Complex fund structures: Specialized funds, such as region-specific funds, co-investment vehicles, and special purpose entities (SPEs), introduce additional layers of governance, reporting, and compliance obligations.
Regulatory burdens increase
Growth venture capital firms also tend to increase their exposure to regulatory scrutiny. For example, crossing certain AUM thresholds can trigger mandatory filings with relevant regulators like the SEC. Additionally, more investors mean more Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance work.
International expansion adds additional complexity to regulatory requirements. Firms must follow varying regulations, such as tax codes, disclosure rules, and securities laws, in each jurisdiction where they operate. Staying on top of all regulatory obligations can be quite challenging.
Growing LP demands for transparency
Limited Partners (LPs) are increasingly expecting greater transparency and more comprehensive reporting from General Partners (GPs) in the private equity industry. They want more frequent, detailed, and transparent reporting, not just during fundraising rounds, but throughout the fund lifecycle. This includes timely capital account statements, NAV updates, performance metrics, and ESG disclosures.
Meeting these heightened expectations for an increased number of investors and funds can be challenging without the proper mechanisms and support in place.
The good news for VC firms is that these challenges are manageable. One of the most effective solutions is leveraging professional fund administration services.
What is venture capital fund administration?
Venture capital fund administration involves outsourcing back-office tasks to a specialized third-party firm. Essentially, the third-party, known as a fund administrator, takes over the day-to-day operational or administrative tasks, such as fund accounting, investor reporting, and regulatory compliance, that VC firms would otherwise need to manage in-house.
How fund administration helps scale venture capital firms
Fund administration plays a crucial role in supporting firms during periods of expansion by managing the increasing demands of back-office functions. For example, they can provide support in several key areas, including the following.
Streamlining capital call and distribution processes
Fund administration automates and organizes the capital call and distribution workflow, ensuring that these transactions are executed seamlessly and on time. This reduces the manual workload on VC firms, mitigates the risk of errors and improves the overall experience for investors.
Enhancing LP reporting and transparency
Fund administration provides the necessary infrastructure to ensure that all limited partners (LPs) receive timely, accurate, and consistent reports on their investments. Such transparency fosters trust and confidence among investors and helps maintain strong, ongoing relationships as the firm scales its operations.
Supporting regulatory compliance and governance
Fund administrators ensure that VC firms meet all regulatory obligations as they scale by managing the necessary filings and documentation. They handle KYC and AML checks and maintain proper records on these. In addition, fund administrators closely monitor changes in the regulatory environment and advise firms on any changes they might need to make to ensure compliance.
Why outsourcing fund administration makes strategic sense
According to a 2024 Ocorian survey, 99% of private equity, venture capital, and real estate fund managers globally plan to increase outsourcing over the next three years, with nearly half (46%) targeting a 25–50% increase in outsourced functions.
Besides helping firms overcome some of the operational complexities that come with scaling, outsourcing fund administrations offers several other significant advantages.
Cost savings
Building an in-house fund administration team requires significant resources, including hiring specialized staff, investing in technology, and training employees to keep up with changing regulations. As a firm grows, the costs associated with maintaining this infrastructure can quickly add up.
Outsourcing to a third-party fund administrator like Alter Domus, allows VC firms to leverage professional services and technology without the overhead of managing these functions internally.
Access to specialized expertise and evolving best practices
Outsourcing gives VC firms access to professionals who are highly experienced in private fund structures and up to date with the latest regulations, best practices, and financial technologies. This ensures higher accuracy and professionalism across key fund activities, including accounting and investor reporting.
Freeing internal teams to focus on core investing activities
Perhaps one of the most significant benefits of outsourcing fund administration is that it frees internal teams to prioritize sourcing, evaluating, and managing investments.
By offloading the time-consuming and often complex administrative tasks deal teams can dedicate their expertise and energy to identifying promising investment opportunities and actively supporting their portfolio companies. This ensures that the core value-creation activities of the VC firm remain the central focus.
Alter Domus: A partner in venture capital fund administration
If you’re looking for a fund administration partner that offers deep industry expertise, great flexibility, and tailored solutions to support your growth, Alter Domus could be a good fit.
Here’s what you can expect when you partner with Alter Domus:
Comprehensive fund accounting:
Expert management of fund accounting, including investment tracking, valuations, waterfall and carried interest calculations, and much more.
Investor reporting:
Detailed and transparent reporting to keep your investors informed about the performance and health of their investments and the fund in general..
Capital call and distribution processing:
Streamlined management of capital calls and distributions to ensure accuracy and timely execution.
Regulatory compliance support:
Comprehensive guidance on meeting regulatory requirements and maintaining compliance across different jurisdictions.
Tech-driven solutions:
Integration of advanced fund administration solutions designed to automate workflows, enhance operational efficiency, and provide real-time transparency.
Full fund lifecycle management:
End-to-end support, from fund formation through to exit, with tailored services to ensure smooth operation at all stages.
Audit support:
Comprehensive audit assistance, including the preparation of relevant documentation and coordination with auditors to ensure a smooth audit process.
Wrapping up: How venture capital fund administration supports growth
Fund administration plays a key role in the growth of venture capital firms by providing the structure and expertise needed to manage increasing operational demands and complexity. It takes care of administrative tasks like fund accounting, investor reporting, and compliance management, which frees internal teams to focus on what matters most: identifying high-potential investments and driving growth.
With deep industry knowledge and a commitment to excellence, Alter Domus is the ideal venture capital fund administration partner to help streamline operations and support your firm’s growth. Explore Alter Domus venture capital solutions and fund administration solutions to learn more.
News
Fund accounting & reporting services for venture capital firms
Venture capital accounting is a niche field of accounting that focuses on managing, tracking, and reporting the financial operations of venture capital (VC) funds.
Unlike traditional business accounting, which is primarily concerned with the revenue, expense, and profits of a company, venture capital accounting involves more complex financial structures and tasks, such as tracking capital contributions, calculating investment valuations, and managing the distribution of returns.
In this guide, we will explore the essential components of venture capital accounting and explain some of the benefits of outsourcing this critical function to specialized fund accounting services providers like Alter Domus.

The unique fund accounting needs of venture capital firms
Venture capital (VC) firms operate in a dynamic and highly specialized environment within the private markets space. As a result, their fund accounting needs are markedly different from those of investment managers with public market strategies.
Below are some accounting functions and needs unique to venture capital firms:
Capital calls and distributions management:
Managing and documenting capital calls to limited partners (LPs) and distributions from the fund, and ensuring proper allocation based on ownership and allocation ratios.
Portfolio company valuation:
Performing periodic valuation of portfolio companies according to industry standards.
Carried interest and waterfall calculations:
Tracking carried interest (carry) and modelling complex waterfall structures to determine profit allocations among stakeholders.
Net asset value (NAV) calculation:
Determining the fund’s NAV, which represents the total value of the fund’s assets minus its liabilities.
Fee management:
alculating and tracking management fees, performance fees, and reimbursements at both fund and investor levels.
Investor reporting:
Providing timely, transparent, and customized reports to limited partners.
Audit and compliance support:
Maintaining detailed records to support annual audits tax filings, and compliance with both local regulations and foreign ones, such as the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) in Europe.
Why timely and transparent financial reporting matters for VC firms
Because venture funds typically operate with long timelines and limited liquidity, LPs depend on clear and regular reporting to understand how their capital is being deployed and managed. This includes updates on valuations, capital movements, and overall fund performance.
As such, the ability to deliver accurate and timely information can be a major strategic advantage for VC firms, offering the following benefits:
Increased trust and credibility with LPs:
Timely and transparent reporting fosters trust by showing that the firm is actively monitoring the financial health of its portfolio and making informed decisions. When investors can see accurate and up-to-date financial data, they are more likely to stay engaged and confident in the firm’s ability to manage their money.
Better reputation in the market:
Firms that consistently provide accurate, transparent financial reporting are often viewed more favorably in the market. A track record of transparent reporting serves as a signal of professionalism and operational maturity. This reputation can help attract new investors, high-quality investments, talented portfolio companies, and top-tier talent. All this can contribute to long-term success.
Regulatory compliance and risk mitigation:
VC firms are subject to regulatory requirements that demand accurate financial disclosures. Transparent reporting ensures compliance with these regulations, avoiding legal complications and potential penalties from bodies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Benefits of outsourcing fund accounting and reporting for VC firms
According to a Dynamo Software survey, one of the biggest challenges facing venture capital and private equity funds today is financial reporting, with 64% reporting delays in preparing financial reports. This is not exactly surprising as venture capital fund accounting can be quite complex and demanding.
Indeed, this is one of the primary reasons many VC firms today are choosing to outsource this crucial function to specialized fund accounting services providers like Alter Domus.
Outsourcing venture capital fund accounting and reporting offers several advantages, including the following:
Access to expertise and best practices:
Fund accounting is a specialized discipline that requires deep knowledge of financial regulations, valuation methodologies, and industry-specific reporting standards. Outsourcing gives VC firms access to professionals who are highly experienced in private fund structures and who are up-to-date with the latest regulatory changes and best practices. This ensures a higher level of accuracy and professionalism in all financial reporting.
Improved compliance and risk management:
Regulatory scrutiny of VC firms has increased, making it more important than ever to ensure accurate, timely, and compliant financial reporting. Fund accounting service providers use standardized processes and dedicated controls that reduce the likelihood of errors and help meet fiduciary and regulatory obligations. This helps VC firms avoid costly mistakes and reputational damage.
Cost savings and efficiency:
Outsourcing venture capital fund accounting helps firms reduce the overhead costs associated with maintaining an in-house accounting team. Hiring, training, and retaining skilled professionals can be expensive, especially when the workload fluctuates. Third-party service providers offer scalable solutions, allowing firms to pay for exactly what they need when they need it.
Faster, more consistent reporting:
Experienced third-party providers typically leverage purpose-built technologies and automation tools to deliver consistent, timely reporting. As previously mentioned, better reporting improves investor trust and confidence and can increase a VC firm’s overall reputation and perception in the market.
Freedom to focus on core investment activities:
Outsourcing fund accounting and reporting frees up internal resources to focus on high-value activities like building relationships with investors, sourcing new deals, and optimizing the performance of their portfolio companies.
How Alter Domus supports fund accounting and reporting for venture capital firms
Alter Domus is a global fund administrator with deep expertise in alternative assets such as venture capital funds. The company helps VC firms better manage their accounting and reporting needs with a range of practical and reliable services that include:
Capital call and distribution processing:
Managing the process of capital calls and distributions of proceeds.
NAV calculation:
Accurate and timely calculation of Net Asset Value (NAV).
Management fee and carried interest calculations:
Accurate calculation and processing of management fees and carried interest in line with fund agreements.
Financial statement preparation:
Preparing financial statements in accordance with relevant accounting standards (e.g., IFRS, US GAAP).
Tax compliance support:
Assisting in preparing tax documentation and ensuring compliance with relevant regulations.
Investor Reporting:
Generating customized reports for investors that provide clarity on fund performance, portfolio holdings, and financial activities.
Wrapping up: Fund accounting & reporting for venture capital firms
Venture capital accounting is vastly different from traditional accounting. It includes unique tasks such as tracking capital calls, conducting fair value assessments, calculating carried interest, and managing complex portfolio valuations. These tasks require specialized knowledge and systems to ensure accuracy, compliance, and timely reporting.
As such, many VC firms are turning to expert fund administrators to handle these specialized accounting tasks. Alter Domus is one such provider, offering accounting and reporting services built around the specific needs of venture capital funds. Learn more about Alter Domus’ venture capital solutions and fund administration services, or get in touch to discuss how we can help with your fund’s accounting and reporting requirements.
Analysis
Venture capital compliance requirements
Venture capital funds are pooled investment vehicles that provide financing to startups and emerging companies with high growth potential. In exchange, they take an ownership stake and aim to generate significant returns by exiting these investments later on through events like initial public offerings (IPOs), mergers, or acquisitions.
Like all participants in the financial markets, venture capital funds are subject to a range of regulations designed to ensure transparency, protect investors, and maintain market integrity.
For VC managers, understanding and adhering to these regulations is crucial not only to avoid legal repercussions and penalties, but also to build investor trust, manage risks effectively, and secure the long-term success of both the fund and its portfolio companies.
This article explores the key compliance requirements that apply to venture capital firms, the challenges of managing compliance internally, and how fund administrators like Alter Domus can support VC firms in meeting their obligations.

Key compliance obligations for VC firms
Let’s look at some of the key compliance requirements for starting and managing a venture capital firm or fund.
SEC registration and reporting
Most venture capital funds in the US are typically “private funds,” which means they don’t need to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as ‘investment companies”..
What’s more, many VC firms are classified as Exempt Reporting Advisers (ERAs) under the Dodd-Frank Act, and as such, they are not required to register with the SEC as investment advisers.
However, VC firms are still subject to certain obligations. This includes completing specific sections of Form ADV Part 1A, such as information about their business, ownership, and any sanctions they or their personnel have faced.
In addition, VC firms that qualify as ERAs are required to regularly update their Form ADV to ensure the SEC has accurate and timely information. This includes 2 key obligations.
- ERAs must file an update to Form ADV at least once annually, within 90 days of the end of their fiscal year.
- In addition to the annual filing, firms must promptly amend Form ADV whenever there are material changes to the information previously disclosed, such as changes or updates in ownership, business structure, or disciplinary history.
Fundraising and marketing
Most VC firms raise capital from investors through “exempt offerings,” which essentially allows them to sell securities without registering with the SEC.The most commonly used exemption is Regulation D, particularly Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c).
Rule 506(b) allows VC firms to raise an unlimited amount of money from accredited investors and up to 35 non-accredited investors. However, this rule forbids general solicitation, meaning that firms cannot publicly advertise their offerings or use broad marketing tactics. All fundraising efforts must be done privately, typically through existing relationships or direct outreach.
Rule 506(c) offers a different approach by permitting general solicitation and public advertising, opening up the possibility of reaching a wider pool of potential investors. However, this flexibility comes with a significant condition: all purchasers of the fund’s interests must be accredited investors, and the venture capital fund must undertake reasonable measures to confirm each investor’s accredited status.
Regardless of whether a venture capital fund uses Rule 506(b) or 506(c), a critical compliance requirement under Regulation D is the timely filing of Form D with the SEC. This brief notice, which provides basic details about the offering, including the amount being raised and the type of investors targeted, must be submitted within 15 days after the first sale of securities.
In addition to the aforementioned SEC regulations, venture capital funds must also be mindful of state-level securities laws, often referred to as “blue sky laws,” in each state where they solicit investors. These state regulations may impose additional requirements that firms must meet alongside the federal rules of Regulation D.
It’s crucial to consult legal counsel to ensure compliance with state requirements.
Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) Requirements
Previously, many venture capital firms, particularly those that qualified as ERAs, were not required to follow comprehensive Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations in the same way as banks or broker-dealers under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).
While the SEC could take enforcement actions related to misleading statements about voluntary AML procedures, there was no direct mandate under the BSA for these VC firms to establish full-fledged AML programs.
However, a significant regulatory shift is on the horizon with a final rule issued by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) on August 28, 2024.
This new rule amends the BSA regulations to include certain SEC-registered investment advisers (RIAs) and ERAs within the definition of “financial institution” under the BSA. This means that a significant portion of venture capital fund managers will now be directly subject to AML obligations.
Specifically, from January 1, 2026, VC firms must establish formal AML compliance programs that include procedures for identifying and reporting suspicious activities, conducting risk assessments, and maintaining thorough records. Additionally, firms must implement Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols to verify the identity of their investors and assess the source of their funds.
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations
Although Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting isn’t yet a formal compliance requirement for many venture capital firms, it has rapidly become a significant area of focus for both regulators and investors.
In regions like the EU, regulations such as the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) are already pushing firms to disclose how they integrate ESG factors. Though these regulations are currently more applicable to larger firms, they signal a shift that may expand to all VC firms over time.
In the U.S., the SEC has adopted rules for public companies to disclose climate-related risks. Similar frameworks could eventually extend to private funds, including venture capital firms.
What’s more, LPs are increasingly demanding greater ESG data reporting from firms, with some even willing to pay more for it. For example, according to a report by PwC Luxembourg, two-thirds of surveyed LPs indicated a willingness to pay higher management fees if it leads to significant improvements in ESG data reporting by their GPs.
Additionally, nearly 45% of respondents said they would consider a fee increase of 5% to 9% if it resulted in more comprehensive and higher-quality ESG reporting practices.
Proactively adopting ESG policies and reporting frameworks can prepare VCs for future regulatory changes and at the same time help gain a competitive edge in the market by demonstrating to investors that they are forward-thinking, transparent, and responsible in their approach to managing investments.
Strategic importance of compliance
Builds trust and credibility:
A strong compliance record signals to investors and portfolio companies that the VC firm operates ethically and with integrity. This fosters trust and enhances the firm’s reputation, which is crucial for attracting and retaining both investors and promising startups.
Prevents legal and financial penalties:
Non-compliance can lead to significant fines, legal battles, and even the loss of licenses to operate. A sturdy compliance program minimizes these risks.
Protects against financial crime:
Implementing strong KYC and AML procedures, as mandated by regulations, safeguards the firm and its investors from financial crimes and reputational damage.
Challenges of managing compliance internally
High resource demands:
Effectively managing compliance internally demands significant time and personnel. For smaller venture capital firms, this can stretch resources thin and lead to oversight gaps where certain regulatory requirements are missed or misunderstood.
Constantly changing regulations:
The regulatory environment for venture capital is complex and frequently shifting, with new rules, reporting standards, and jurisdictional requirements. Keeping pace with these changes internally is difficult, especially for firms operating across multiple regions. This increases the likelihood of inadvertent noncompliance.
Insufficient internal expertise:
Compliance requires deep knowledge of specialized areas, such as financial regulations, anti-money laundering policies, and evolving trends like ESG disclosures. Many firms, particularly smaller ones, lack professionals with expertise in these areas. This lack of sufficient in-house expertise could lead to misinterpretations of regulatory requirements and thus non-compliance.
Rising operational costs:
Maintaining compliance internally can be expensive. Firms may need to invest in additional staff, ongoing training, continuous monitoring, and internal audits. For smaller firms, these added costs can divert resources away from other important business activities, such as deal sourcing and portfolio management.
How Alter Domus supports venture capital compliance
Alter Domus provides specialized compliance services that help venture capital firms meet regulatory requirements effortlessly. Key areas of support include:
Regulatory filings:
Assistance with the preparation and submission of crucial filings such as Form ADV, Form D, and other jurisdictional reporting obligations.
Ongoing monitoring and support:
Continuous monitoring of regulatory changes and updates relevant to VC firms, proactive communication of these changes, and ongoing support in adapting compliance programs accordingly.
AML and KYC support:
Assistance with creating, implementing, and maintaining KYC and AML programs.
ESG reporting support:
Assistance with ESG data collection, aligning with relevant ESG frameworks, and preparing ESG disclosures to meet the expectations of limited partners and comply with any relevant regulations.
Audit support:
Assistance with audit preparation, including organizing required documents, coordinating with auditors, and addressing audit-related questions or issues.
Final thoughts: Venture capital compliance requirements
Compliance management is a critical function in venture capital firms. Besides helping firms meet legal requirements, it builds investor trusts, reduces risk exposure, and contributes to long-term operational stability.
However, for firms with lean teams, staying on top of compliance can be time-consuming and complex. This is where specialized support, like that provided by a fund administrator like Alter Domus, can make a big difference.
Alter Domus takes care of your compliance requirements and operations, including regulatory filings, AML/KYC implementation, and ESG reporting, so you and your team can focus on your core business of finding and nurturing high-potential startups without having to worry about meeting your regulatory obligations.
Explore Alter Domus administration and governance solutions or reach out to our team today to learn more about how we can support your firm’s compliance strategy today.
Analysis
Portfolio optimization and the Alter Domus Score: A use case for CLOs
Why the Alter Domus Scores’ simplicity, robustness, and capacity for automation makes it an effective metric for trade optimization.

Overview
Alter Domus recently introduced the Alter Domus Score (ADS), a metric for fixed income assets that managers can use to improve their portfolio trade optimization decisions. The ADS is unit-based and can be applied universally across all types of fixed income assets, allowing managers to rank order assets based on relative value. The ADS is useful for managers when considering portfolio allocation tradeoffs where constraints exist. These constraints can be market, investor, or regulatory based.
In this paper, collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) are referenced as a use case to demonstrate how a CLO manager can apply the ADS framework to help optimize portfolio allocations. An example of ADS portfolio optimization in a typical environment for CLO managers is presented. The objective of the CLO manager in this case is to maximize the overall portfolio ADS while adhering to various constraints.
The examples first cover the case for a single CLO portfolio and then expand to a scenario in which a CLO manager seeks to optimize its portfolio allocations across multiple CLO portfolios. The goal is to provide an overview of the practical applications of the ADS framework.
Portfolio optimization and ADS: a use case for CLOs
A typical US-based CLO portfolio includes primarily first-lien senior secured loans to corporate borrowers. These portfolios are managed actively, with trading adhering to reinvestment criteria outlined in the CLO’s indenture. The lifecycle of a CLO usually includes a ramp-up period, a reinvestment period, and an amortization period.
The reinvestment criteria establish the rules within which the asset manager can trade. In addition to defining the types of assets that can be purchased (such as eligible collateral obligations), these criteria generally include various categories of portfolio-level constraints [1]:
- Portfolio concentration limitations,
- Collateral quality tests, and
- Coverage tests.
To enhance the efficiency and productivity of investable capital while adhering to reinvestment criteria, managers carefully navigate various trade-offs in portfolio allocation decisions. By adopting a trade optimization approach, managers effectively refine their investment choices so that they strike the right balance between risk and return. This strategic method not only maximizes capital utilization but also aligns with the overarching investment goals.
A CLO manager has a range of metrics to optimize, such as yield, portfolio par, or average life. In this context, we previously outlined the benefits of utilizing ADS as a foundation for potentially enhancing optimization or generating trade ideas. The ADS, unlike other metrics, offers a parsimonious, objective, and easy-to-use measure that is ideal for trade optimization.
It is important to recognize that, beyond the general reinvestment criteria outlined in the CLO indenture, managers are faced with additional key external constraints dictated by market conditions – specifically, the array of investments available for purchase as well as prevailing market prices. Consequently, fundamental questions arise, such as determining the universe of eligible assets available for acquisition and their corresponding prices. Furthermore, it is necessary to consider whether asset substitutions within the existing portfolio could lead to a more optimal solution. This consideration applies to prospective assets in both the primary and secondary loan markets. Incorporating robust trade optimization methods and tools, alongside the manager’s credit and trading expertise, enhances the manager’s ability to balance a portfolio’s risk-return profile while adhering to constraints.
Exhibit 1 outlines the primary objective of maximizing the overall weighted average ADS, in accordance with the constraints generally specified by a CLO indenture. The exhibit includes examples of typical constraints applicable to a CLO, assuming that any asset under consideration meets the eligibility criteria for purchase. In other words, the goal is to find the optimal asset weights in a portfolio that will maximize ADS while adhering to specified constraints [2].
Exhibit 1: ADS optimization objective for a typical CLO portfolio
In theory, there could be multiple optimal solutions due to various possible portfolio compositions that could meet all constraints, though in practice this is a remote possibility. Typically, some flexibility remains within certain constraints given the available assets and considering a CLO manager’s discretion. In many CLOs, specific tests can often be adjusted, allowing room for one test (like recovery rate) to impact (or modify) the WARF or WAS test. This ultimately leads to finding a more optimal solution, assuming the manager determines that the tradeoff is justified.
Portfolio allocations across CLOs
The optimization objective described above pertains to a single CLO portfolio. However, CLO managers often oversee multiple CLOs simultaneously as they are repeat issuers. The complexity increases as these CLOs may have been issued under different market conditions over time. Additionally, there could be some differences in the constraints applicable to each CLO. Other examples include varying experiences in ratings migration within the portfolio, and some CLOs may be at different stages in their lifecycle, such as during reinvestment or amortization periods. These factors contribute to the complexity of constraints.
In the simplest scenario, the ADS can be optimized independently for each CLO, assuming there are no constraints on the availability of assets to be purchased or traded. In this case, the proportion of allocation to each individual asset is chosen optimally to provide the maximum marginal increase to the ADS for each CLO portfolio. Therefore, it is possible for the optimal portfolio allocation of any prospective asset to range from 0% to 100% for any given CLO.
However, it is not straightforward in practice. The following scenarios are examples that point out potential constraints that may limit an optimal solution across CLO portfolios:
- Limited availability – the CLO manager may encounter a limited supply of certain assets within the marketplace.
- Legal/compliance requirements – the CLO manager may be subject to internal directives imposed by legal and compliance guidelines, which govern asset allocations across the manager’s CLOs.
Exhibit 2: Potential portfolio allocations to a loan under various scenarios
Exhibit 2 above provides an example of a manager looking to reinvest cash proceeds with potential allocations for a particular loan, Loan #1, across three CLOs. The optimal allocation suggests that a total of $16MM should be distributed across the CLOs as shown in the unconstrained scenario. This assumes that the optimal solution is based on the maximization objective described earlier, where the analysis is subject to each individual CLO’s constraints.
If the manager determines that only $10MM of Loan #1 is available, the optimal solution (assuming the greatest marginal benefit is realized by CLO #3) then suggests a different allocation accordingly as shown in the constrained scenario. The analysis also suggests that the remaining $6MM of cash proceeds should be invested in two additional loans, Loan #2 and Loan #3, with respective allocations.
In instances where there is a strict legal or compliance requirement for proportional distribution of the asset, the process is straightforward. Although internal guidelines may recommend a specific portfolio allocation for an individual investment, various factors related to any CLO could prevent this. These factors include potential breaches of certain portfolio constraints, such as limits on borrower, industry, or rating concentrations.
It is understood that these additional limitations result in a suboptimal solution compared to the theoretical unconstrained case – essentially, we could say that this solution is the ‘optimal practical’ solution.
This example suggests that an iterative process would likely occur in practice to find an optimal practical solution, especially if the analysis is conducted on a pro forma basis or after the manager learns what is ultimately available in the marketplace, potentially even with changes in market prices.
To conclude
Fixed income managers often consider tradeoffs when making investment decisions to efficiently deploy investable capital. Alter Domus has introduced the ADS as a basis for managers to enhance their portfolio trade optimization decisions based on one objective and sound metric that is applicable across all fixed income investments. The ADS can be particularly useful in helping managers achieve the best relative value for their investments while facing constraints.
CLOs have been presented as a use case to demonstrate how a CLO manager can apply the ADS framework to optimize portfolio allocations. The example described earlier illustrated ADS portfolio optimization in an environment typical for CLO managers. The objective of the CLO manager is to maximize the overall portfolio ADS while adhering to various constraints as outlined in a CLO indenture. While managers can use other variables such as yield or portfolio par to optimize their portfolio, it has been demonstrated that using the ADS as an alternative metric can be beneficial since it incorporates into one measure the major variables considered in trading credit instruments.
The ADS serves as an effective metric for trade optimization, thanks to its simplicity, robustness, and capacity for automation. Its straightforward nature allows for easy interpretation, while its consistency supports investment decision-making across different market conditions for fixed income investments. Additionally, the automation aspect streamlines the optimization process, making it a valuable tool for enhancing trading strategies.
For AD clients, including clients of Solvas and Enterprise Credit & Risk Analytics, the ADS is offered as an additional measure to support our clients with their trade optimization, portfolio allocation, and risk analytics.
Please contact [email protected] for further information on how to access the ADS.
[1] The reinvestment criteria often involve more detailed requirements than mentioned here. These include par maintenance conditions, variations in criteria based on different trading classifications (such as credit risk/improved, defaulted or discretionary), and can vary depending on the CLO’s lifecycle stage. Additionally, the criteria can differ across CLOs with trading conditions that may be agreed upon between parties before the CLO’s inception, such as deep discount conditions, excess Caa/CCC haircut conditions, or amend to extend guidelines.
[2] Alter Domus utilizes a mixed integer linear programming platform to find the optimal solution for these situations. This method of optimization is well-documented in scientific literature.
Analysis
Private markets pioneers: The rise of interval funds
As private markets managers adopt new fund structures in order to attract non-institutional capital and provide institutional with additional flexibility, interval funds are emerging as a structure of choice for many.
In the fourth of a five-part series, Alter Domus reviews the rapid growth of interval fund assets under management (AUM), the reasons for the structure’s popularity, and the operational and investment capability managers require to run interval funds successfully.

At a time when closing a traditional, ten-year private markets fund has been challenging, managers raising capital through interval funds have seen assets under management (AUM) accelerate.
In the US alone, interval fund AUM has almost quadrupled during the last five years, increasing from just US$18.6 billion in January 2020 to US$93.4 billion in January 2025, according to Morningstar figures reported by Pitchbook.
Interval AUM has surged during a period when private markets fundraising has been in decline. Year-on-year fundraising has now fallen for three consecutive years and in 2024 was down 30 percent on the five-year average, according to Bain & Co analysis.
The growth in interval fund assets has provided a timely capital boost for the alternative assets industry at a difficult point in the fundraising cycle.
Breaking down barriers
Interval funds have been available to investors as early as the 1990s but have experienced a surge in popularity during the last five years as managers have moved to broaden investor bases and raise more capital from non-institutional channels.
The non-institutional investor market has been difficult for private markets managers to crack, with the investment minimums and long periods of illiquidity associated with the traditional, 10-year, close-ended private markets fund an awkward fit for individuals and family investors who have smaller amounts to invest and require more flexibility than long-term horizon institutional investors. A 2024 survey of 100 financial advisers by consultancy NextWealth found that illiquidity was one of the biggest barriers to individual investors investing in private markets.
The huge opportunity that the democratization of private markets presents, however, is so vast (Bain & Co forecasts suggest that non-institutional allocations to alternatives could climb as high as US$12 trillion by 2034) that managers are now working harder than ever to improve their reach into the non-institutional market, and interval funds have emerged as one of the most popular ways of doing so.
Interval funds, however, are not exclusively the preserve of non-institutional investors, with managers offering interval fund investing opportunities noticing strong appetite from institutional clients too.
Ten-year funds are generally a good fit for institutions investing over the long-term, but the flexibility of the interval fund has appealed to LPs too, who like the having the option of adjusting private markets exposure without having to go into the secondaries market, as well as the immediate exposure to private markets assets that interval funds provide.
In ten-year funds, LPs make commitments at the start of the fund’s life, but that capital is only put to work as it is called down through the duration of the fund’s distribution. Uncalled capital can’t be deployed in other assets, as LPs have to be able to meet all capital calls by the fund manager when required. In an interval fund capital is put to work straightway and fully invested in a portfolio of assets at the next trading date
The more liquid structure of an interval fund, meanwhile, has been particularly attractive as distributions from 10-year funds in LP portfolios have dried up. Interval funds have given institutional and non-institutional investors the option of drawing regular yield from their investment but also retain long-term exposure to private markets assets.
A flexible option
Interval funds have emerged as an attractive channel of non-institutional investment as the structure offers opportunities for investors to take liquidity at set times (either quarterly or monthly) as well as allowing investors to invest on daily basis, in the same way as they would in a mutual fund, rather than having to wait for a manager to come to market with a new fund every five years.
It is important for investors to understand, however, the interval funds are not liquid in the same way as stocks or mutual funds, where you can take liquidity on daily basis. Interval funds only offer the option to take redemptions during pre-agreed windows, and these redemptions will typically be limited at around five percent of the interval fund’s net asset value (NAV) at the time of redemption.
But while interval funds are not designed to be traded or present daily liquidity, they do give investors, particularly non-institutional investors, the comfort that their capital is not entirely locked up should they need cash in case of emergencies or life events such as divorce or illness.
The right rails
For managers managing, or seeking to manage, interval funds, it is essential to have the right operational rails in place to manage interval vehicles effectively. The infrastructure that GPs use to raise and manage 10-year funds is different to what is required to oversee interval funds.
Interval funds demand a capable back-office that can operate scale to meet the compliance, reporting and portfolio construction aspects of running these vehicles.
Managers have to have the bandwidth to support potentially hundreds of non—institutional investors in an interval fund, as opposed to relatively small group of institutional LPs in a 10-year fund, and understand the specific compliance, know-your-client (KYC), anti-money laundering (AML) and tax rules as they apply to non-institutional clients.
Managers also have to ensure that their back-offices are able to cope with the additional reporting and portfolio modelling requirements of interval funds. Publishing quarterly or monthly NAV figures to facilitate redemption windows, and the associated reporting, will be step up for managers new to the interval fund market.
Portfolio modelling is also more complex, with managers leaning on real time data from the back and mid-office to calculate what portion of a fund should be held in liquidity sleeves, and what cash will be generated by the portfolio naturally, in order to cover upcoming redemption requests.
Indeed, interval fund portfolios will be structured to include mix private markets assets, such as secondaries and private credit, to ensure that there is always some cash flowing back into the fund. Calculating liquidity requirements and modelling the ideal portfolio construction demands a large and sophisticated back-office function.
The staffing and technology costs that come with handling these obligations are significant and will involve large sums of capital expenditure.
Working with an experienced, tech-enabled fund administration partner, that has the scale and digital infrastructure to absorb the reporting and data demands that come with running interval funds, offers a cost-effective option for managers moving into the interval funds space.
Taking advantage of the large upswing in interval fund AUM, and the opportunity the structure provides to penetrate the non-institutional investor base will not only require front-office investment management pedigree, but also a resilient and robust back-office capability.
Analysis
Private markets pioneers: a natural evolution – the growth of evergreen funds
Despite a slowdown in private markets fundraising, capital flows into evergreen fund structures are on the up
In the second of a five-part series, Alter Domus explores the reasons behind forecasts for double-digit growth in evergreen assets under management (AUM), and why institutional investors in particular are funneling more capital into evergreen fund structures.

Despite double-digit declines in annual private markets fundraising, the outlook for investment in evergreen fund structures is bright.
Evergreen funds (open-ended funds that do not have a fixed fund life, allowing investors to enter or exit at their discretion) have been around for decades, but have seen a surge in popularity during the last five years as investors have recognized the flexible liquidity and immediate market exposure they offer for alternative assets portfolios.
The momentum behind evergreen interest has been particularly strong during the last 24 months as fundraising for traditional, close-ended 10-years funds has cooled off and private markets managers and investors have sought alternative routes for securing and allocating capital.
The growing focus across private markets on raising more funding from the non-institutional investors has been a further spur for growth in evergreen fund assets under management (AUM), as evergreens provide family offices and individual investors with the opportunities to build exposure to private markets strategies at lower investment minimums (starting at $25,000 versus the typical $5 million minimum for a 10-year, close-ended fund) and periodic opportunities to take liquidity.
A natural evolution
The rise and rise of evergreen fund structures is a natural evolution for a private markets asset class that has ambitions to expand its investor base beyond its institutional core.
According to Hamilton Lane, evergreen funds currently account for just 5 percent of overall private markets AUM, which represents close to US$700 billion. Ten years on from now, however, Hamilton Lane anticipates that evergreens will account for at least 20 percent of total private markets AUM, with growth in allocations from high-net worth individual investors the key driver of the rise, as evergreen fund AUM growth outstrips that of 10-year funds.
Forecast growth for evergreen AUM, however, will not be driven exclusively by non-institutional channels, with Hamilton Lane expecting institutional investors to also increase their investment in evergreen structures as a tool for fine-tuning and managing private assets portfolios.
The liquidity optionality offered by evergreen funds has become particularly attractive for institutions during the last 24 months as interest rate dislocation has made it difficult for managers to exit portfolio assets at attractive valuations, leading to a slowdown in distributions back to investors. According to Bain & Co, distributions as a portion of net asset value (NAV) fell to just 11 percent in 2024 – the lowest rate in more than a decade.
Investors have had the option of taking liquidity through LP-led and GP-led secondaries deals but have often had to bear a discount to NAV when doing so. The opportunity that evergreen funds provide to offer some liquidity on a monthly or quarterly basis, at NAV, has appealed to institutions.
Long-term appeal
The appeal of evergreen structures, however, hasn’t only been supported by short-term, cyclical liquidity concerns.
Both institutional and non-institutional investors have also been attracted to other features of evergreen funds, perhaps most notably the time in the market that evergreens can offer.
In traditional 10-year funds large sums of capital have to be committed upfront, but as these funds are blind pool investment vehicles, those commitments are not put to work in assets on day one, but drawn down and invested over the investment period of the fund – usually five years.
Evergreen funds, however, will already be comprised of a core portfolio of assets, that investors will be fully invested as soon as they invest in the fund, providing much more scope to benefit from compounding returns.
Enabling investors to be fully invested from day one has a significant positive impact on the returns an evergreen structure is able to produce.
An analysis of the annualized returns generated by 13 equity-focused evergreen funds from Q3 2019 to Q3 2024 by Hamilton Lane found that evergreens outperformed both the MSCI Word Stock Market Index and all of private equity.
Hamilton Lane illustrates that an evergreen fund that generates a steady (but not spectacular) 12 per cent return over ten years will provide investors with a 2.5 times multiple on invested capital inside a decade. Only six percent of close-ended funds deliver the same money multiple, and have to produce IRRs of more than 20 percent to do so. Capital allocated to evergreen funds and fully invested on day one generates strong comparative money multiples without having to produce knockout returns.
Fee benefits
Fee and carry costs for evergreen funds also compare favorably to those of close-ended funds.
Management fees for the two types of fund structure come out roughly the same for the two structures after a 10-year period, according to Hamilton Lane, with closed-ended fund fees higher earlier in the fund life as capital is deployed during the investment period, and tapering off towards the end of the fund’s life, while evergreen fund management are spread out evenly through a ten-year period.
When factoring in carried interest costs, however, overall fund costs for evergreen funds come in lower than close-ended funds, with evergreen carry charged at around 15 percent and closed-ended fund carry holding at around 20 percent.
As more evergreen funds launch and competition for investor capital intensifies, fees for evergreen funds could come down further, particularly as more price-conscious individual investors invest growing sums in private markets evergreens.
A fund structure for the future
The closed-ended fund structure will remain an important pathway for capital deployment, but will not be the only route to private markets exposure in the future as non-institutional investors account for an ever-greater share of the investor base and institutional investors take advantage of the flexibility that evergreen funds offer for accessing liquidity and managing portfolios.
The uptick in evergreen fund launches is only just beginning.
Learn more about Alter Domus’ fund administration services
Alter Domus has significantly expanded its capabilities to support the administration of open-ended private market funds, including evergreen structures. This development aligns with the growing demand from institutional and retail investors for greater liquidity and flexibility in alternative investments.
Alter Domus has enhanced its open-ended fund administration by enabling more frequent NAV calculations and streamlined liquidity management, allowing fund managers to better meet investor redemption and subscription needs. Leveraging the Temenos Multifonds platform, the firm automates essential processes such as capital calls, valuations, and distributions, while integrating with financial networks like SWIFT and NSCC to improve settlement efficiency. It also offers comprehensive transfer agency services—acting directly in Luxembourg and partnering with providers in North America and the UK to manage diverse distribution channels. Additionally, Alter Domus has strengthened its investor reporting and regulatory compliance capabilities, including support for evolving frameworks like ELTIF 2.0.
The expansion of Alter Domus’ services reflects a broader industry trend toward the democratization of private markets. Regulatory changes in the EU, US, and UK are broadening access to private market investments, leading to increased demand for fund structures that offer liquidity and flexibility. Alter Domus’ enhanced capabilities position it to meet these evolving needs, supporting both traditional institutional clients and a growing base of retail investors. By leveraging advanced technology and comprehensive services, Alter Domus enables fund managers to efficiently administer open-ended and evergreen fund structures, aligning with the industry’s shift toward more accessible and flexible investment vehicles.

Services
Open-ended Fund Administration
While they offer significant opportunities, OEF characteristics also come with enhanced commitments. Marry these with the nuances of alternative asset classes and you need experts to unlock the opportunity.
Analysis
The growth of the private debt market: Trends, opportunities, and challenges
Explore the growth of the private debt market, including key opportunities & challenges.
Analysis
Private debt financing vs bank lenders: How the market is evolving
Explore how private debt financing is evolving and competing with traditional bank lenders.
Analysis
Private credit vs. public credit: Understanding the key differences and benefits
Understand the difference between private and public credit, including the benefits of each option.
Analysis
Private debt funds: An in-depth guide
Learn how private debt funds work and the role of debt asset management.