Chicago, October 15th, 2024 – Alter Domus, a leading provider of tech-enabled fund administration, asset and corporate services for the alternative investment industry, has refined its middle office services as part of its comprehensive private debt offering. The offering brings together services, proprietary technology, and data integration, allowing private debt managers, broadly syndicated loan managers, and CLO managers to scale their strategies and meet their evolving needs.

By combining services, technology and data integration, Alter Domus delivers a best-of-breed front- to back-office solution, with a strong focus on continuous updates and seamless integration with clients’ preferred front-office, cloud, or back-office platforms and tools.

This commitment is evident in the firm’s $1.4 trillion debt assets under administration, and its ability to service complex bespoke loans, such as payment-in-kind (PIKs), unitranche, participations and non-pro rata while maintaining a “golden copy” of the client’s data throughout the entire loan lifecycle. Clients benefit from a cohesive, customized middle-office solution that is capable of handling today’s increasingly complex credit environment and the unique ways that each firm approaches their fund operations.

The middle office has long been underserved when it comes to loan servicing, and Alter Domus’ enhanced middle office capabilities address this gap. It is the result of our decades of experience serving loan market participants together with significant investments in specialized loan technology

Greg Myers, Sector Head of Private Debt at Alter Domus

Alter Domus’ middle office service offering includes:

• Loan services: Alter Domus’s servicing teams provide a cost-effective and scalable solution that includes loan accounting, tracking, reconciliation, and reporting, all carried out on the firm’s proprietary solutions, Solvas and Virtual Back Office.
• Agency services: Alter Domus is the largest loan agency service provider on the market, serving the world’s biggest private debt and broadly syndicated loan (BSL) managers. Its scalable, proprietary technology coupled with sector-specific knowledge is purpose-built to reduce the risk and burdens of administering leveraged loan, private credit, and BSL transactions for clients.com/services/private-debt-solutions/.

To learn more about Alter Domus’ comprehensive private debt offering, visit alterdomus.com/services/private-debt-solutions.

About Alter Domus

Alter Domus is a leading provider of tech-enabled fund administration, private debt, and corporate services for the alternative investment industry with more than 5,800 employees across 39 offices globally. Solely dedicated to alternatives, Alter Domus offers fund administration, corporate services, depositary services, capital administration, transfer pricing, domiciliation, management company services, loan administration, agency services, trade settlement and CLO manager services.

Find out more at www.alterDomus.com

Media Contact
[email protected]

Interview

Q Given the rapid growth of private credit, what do managers need to consider when shaping their operating models to take advantage of new opportunities?

There are a number of considerations – not only the outsource versus insource question, and which systems and technologies to engage, but also the allocation of costs. Typically, overheads and internal staff are paid for by the management team whereas fund expenses or middle office administrative costs are borne by the funds themselves. Attempting to reach that balance with the right oversight and the correct cost allocations is a challenge, as is how much control you want over the entire system. Oversight and control can take many forms, managers need to ask themselves whether it is enough to have a small staff overseeing a provider, or whether building an entire oversight operation that oversees everything done by a provider would serve their interests better. Similarly, private credit has far more moving parts than exists in bonds or equities. Obviously, the oversight and investment management is similar, but loans are more complex with multiple tranches, different rates and payments of principal and various sources of income that need to be tracked. Added to that, the information ecosystem that exists for broadly syndicated loans isn’t there for private credit, so you may be in a small group of lenders where the data is not easily recovered, creating its own problems.

The choice of operating model also depends on the size of the manager and their level of experience. The infrastructure required for private credit operations and accounting is very different to private equity. In credit, you need the ability to track portfolios that are very dynamic – an entirely different skillset for accounting and operations staff . Investors now typically require a fund administrator, so the question really is what level of infrastructure is needed to engage and oversee your chosen administrator. At Alter Domus, we use a number of systems. We own innovative technology such as Solvas, which offers integrated accounting, modelling and credit risk solutions, alongside a licensed loan administration platform called Sentry. This means we can support from inside a client’s own portfolio management system – integrating data and sometimes even operating from within the client’s systems. All these options feed into our fund accounting systems, which provide managers and investors with regular reports – either on a monthly or quarterly basis. Clients receive data feeds so they can update their own internal accounting systems. Some clients are very light touch and comfortable with an outsourcing model; others run a full internal operations team that tracks what we are doing daily. There is a cost implication to the latter, but we work to what our clients need.

Q What should managers look at when considering outsourcing versus insourcing options?

Not all fund administrators offer portfolio accounting in their loan administration system, but at Alter Domus, we find that it is key to the core team having enough understanding to be able to check daily. Whether you opt to outsource or run your own team, experience is key, something which we have found is getting harder to find amid the talent squeeze that exists within running private credit operations. Finally, I’d highlight the value in an organization’s ability to manage and track data internally and whether they have the requisite software and IT systems that can support substantial data.

Q How can managers maximize opportunities around technology to support their operations?

We have found that a lot more managers opt for co-sourcing arrangements today, meaning we do the work on their systems. They can trust that they have full transparency and access to everything we do, as well as the ability to seamlessly access the underlying data that we work with. This is becoming the preferred model and more commonplace, as managers can achieve greater efficiencies when they don’t have to manage or hire staff – they are making the investment in the technology but not the headcount.

We have completed several successful lift-outs over the past few years when we took on the staff and cost from a client and updated their systems. In doing this, we construct a revenue model that makes sense for the manager, while giving their people a career path that they might not have access to if they stayed at the fund manager. It is much more important to investor today that they have access, through their manager, to all their underlying portfolio data, so it often makes sense for managers to own that IT infrastructure.

Q What should GPs prioritize for data integration?

Within each GP, there is often a struggle between constituencies. Investor relations teams want a whole set of data around performance and what they can put together for investors; operations teams need enough access and availability to analyze data and satisfy investment professionals; the front office wants feedback on performance of the portfolio assets, and the accounting team need to make sure the fund books and internal books of the manager are up to date. There is no single system that does all those things and satisfying all of those constituencies is huge task. Many of our clients will focus on one aspect first before moving forward with others, depending on their own priorities.

Q How are both LP and regulatory demands likely to evolve going forward, and what can managers do to future-proof their approaches?

It is always risky to speculate on this, particularly in the US, given the political backdrop of a presidential election year. What is clear is that there will be an even greater increase in regulation and oversight down the line, as legacy private credit was historically handled by regulated banks and institutions. Despite the overruling of the SEC regulations, we expect an increase in adoption of the practices and disclosures recommended in them, as well as a heightened focus on how private credit operates with investor money being lent to private companies. Understandably, LPs want more and more. The operational data that we help clients prepare for the more sophisticated LPs is increasingly time-consuming, with requirements for everything from information safeguards through to physical office security. The detail required in these requests is also getting more and more granular. Managers need to have a highly robust framework in place to ensure their internal infrastructure can meet those demands. That means thorough change management investment underwriting and oversight processes, and partnering with service providers that have corresponding policies and procedures. Even more investment is going to be needed into compliance infrastructure, or in partnering with others that have made that investment in a way that can be relied upon.

As the private equity industry has grown and matured, so have the operational, regulatory and reporting demands on the asset class. This has been particularly challenging for those managers with leaner back-office teams, who have had to focus resources on the core business of finding and backing great businesses and management teams. This model, which has served managers so well for so long, is now pushing against its limits.

On the regulatory front, US managers are bracing for the implementation of new SEC rules that will oblige managers to produce audit and quarterly performance reports and provide more detailed disclosure on fund expenses. In Europe, meanwhile, managers are readying for the rollout of the next version of the AIFMD II in 2026, which will add to compliance disclosure and reporting requirements. In addition to a higher volume of regulatory disclosure, managers are also navigating the complexities of working with an increasingly international and diverse investor base and the accompanying increase in requests for bespoke, tailored investor reporting. For managers with the scale to invest in large back-office infrastructure adapting to higher disclosure and reporting volumes has been manageable. For other managers, however, existing operating models simply cannot ramp in the same way.

Fund administrators: key partners for long-term success
As private equity evolves, regulation increases and investors become more sophisticated, certain fund services providers are emerging as key partners in the midmarket and will have a crucial role to play in the sector’s long-term success. Rather than facing a scenario where €10-15m of capital expenditure has to be ploughed into upgrading the back-office capacity – at the expense of the core front-office functions of deal sourcing and execution – smaller managers can turn to fund administration partners to support their back-office obligations and free-up resources to focus on transactions and value creation.

Fund administrators, working with hundreds of managers across multiple jurisdictions, have the economies of scale and operational synergies to invest in fund accounting and reporting, regulatory expertise and technology platforms at levels that would be impossible for a single manager trying to carry the load in isolation. Outsourcing back-office functions to regulatory and reporting experts, who have the technology and human capital to handle more complex and intense workflows, gives managers the comfort that their obligations to investors and regulators are being addressed by expert service providers that know the market and have the muscle to scale-up capacity to meet intensifying back-office demands.

Enhancing technology capability is an example of how fund administrators are adding value for clients. In addition to opening access to best-of-breed industry software offerings and realistic price points, fund services partners also have the size and resources to build and maintain proprietary technology that can help clients to operate more efficiently. Alter Domus’ Digital Workflows Application, which uses AI and automation technology to handle the increasing volume and complexity of reporting and transaction flow, for example, is available to clients and can help managers to secure significant operational efficiencies.

Opportunities emerge from challenges
Partnering with a fund services provider to boost back-office bandwidth is not only a defensive play for managers. Harnessing a fund administrator’s service capability can help to unlock new sources of liquidity and new investor bases.

With liquidity for example, a slowdown in exit volumes in the face of higher interest rates has seen managers explore continuation fund vehicles as an alternative exit route to secondary buyouts, as well as trade sales and IPOs, to realize distributions for investors. Fund administrators can help managers to undertake continuation fund deals more frequently and in higher volumes. In addition to complex deal execution and organization, continuation fund vehicles also require ongoing administration and reporting.

Fund administrators can scale-up support to assist managers, as continuation fund deals are secured without placing the additional demand of back-offices. The back-office heft of a fund services partner also opens up pathways into non-institutional investor bases. The administrative demands of raising capital from individual investors – typically through private wealth feeder funds, or semi-liquid funds and open-ended structures, such as Europe’s emerging ELTIF regime – can be a non-starter for managers with small back-office teams. These structures require more regular reporting of portfolio NAV and the capacity to provide liquidity for capped redemptions during fixed windows. Client onboarding and compliance volumes also ramp up significantly when capital is raised from large numbers of non-institutional clients rather than the limited groups of institutional investors that are the norm in closed-ended private equity funds.

Managers can turn to fund administrators that are already operating at scale to digest the additional know-your-client, cashflow monitoring and reporting workflows that come with raising capital from
non-institutional channels.

Partners for the long-term
Shifts in what investors and regulators expect from private equity managers, the types of investors
managers are raising capital from, and the exit pathways available in a more sophisticated market, are reshaping how the asset class is thinking about its back-office requirements. This transformation is particularly challenging for smaller players, but through long-term partnerships with fund administration experts, managers can share the administrative load of operating in a more mature industry and stay focused on what they do best.

Mike Janiszewski, Chief Operating Officer, spoke to PEI Fund Services report about the value of outsourcing administrative functions to respond to the increased market demand from individual investors. With about half of global assets under management (AUM) held by individuals, private fund managers are keen to tap into this vast potential. Large asset managers, like Blackstone, have ambitious goals for increasing their retail capital offer. However, accommodating individual investors in alternatives, presents significant complexity- complicated structures, dealing with varying regulations, individual tax burdens and increasing back-office administration.

Mike opined that “Taking on investment from private wealth investors will require a step-change in middle- and back-office infrastructure” Private markets have responded to this already and multiple investment structures are being adopted to accommodate the differing needs of individual investors, as well as new distribution channels and digital platforms. At AD, we have been specializing in this for the past 20 years; delivering for our clients via a combination of jurisdictional, technological and administrative expertise.

Ultimately, leveraging technology for automation and data streamlining must come alongside partnership with third-party providers who can harness new tools for great success. Reach out to to find out more.

Interview

Q You have recently joined Alter Domus as chief technology officer. What background do you bring to the role, and how is that perspective useful for Alter Domus and its clients?

Most recently, I was a chief technology officer at Wells Fargo bank. Before that I was the CTO of the financial data and software company FactSet, which was my final role there over a 20-year period. In these positions I’ve been in­volved with a vast array of initiatives, from developing mobile capabilities and addressing challenges such as iden­tity protection and fraud prevention to developing and executing artificial in­telligence strategies and implementing generative AI.

Alter Domus is my first experience in a private equity-owned company. The mandate of the senior team here is clear: how do we use technology to make our services more efficient, more intuitive, and more impactful for our clients?

At Alter Domus, my team owns all the technology and app development efforts for the business, as well as the data analytics and engineering and some of the product strategy from a technology perspective. The goal is to help continue to scale an already rap­idly growing business and drive sever­al transformative initiatives, with one area of focus being the data and ana­lytics business, where we see a lot of potential.

Q What is your perspective on AI and its adoption in private markets?

AI has been fundamental to many com­panies and products for a number of years. Companies such as Tesla have been working on self-driving vehicles for more than 10 years, and those are in­herently AI-enabled. So, AI is not new.

What has changed is that last year saw probably one of the most suc­cessful marketing campaigns ever launched when Open AI unveiled its initial version of ChatGPT. We all started talking about generative AI and what ChatGPT would mean for us. Adoption of that tool went from zero to 100 million active users in just two months, making it the fastest growing consumer application in history. That showed the art of the possible with generative AI, and immediately drove that conversation in boardrooms.

Right now, what is important for business is to thoughtfully manage the gap between AI hype and practical business applications. Businesses need to prioritize opportunities in order of obtainability and then manage commu­nications with stakeholders to create meaningful outcomes. Too often, com­panies become focused on what’s new, rather than what’s best, or more to the point in Alter Domus’s case, what’s best for our customers.

Q What steps are service providers like Alter Domus taking in AI?

We believe that before any concrete actions are taken in AI development, governance issues have to be addressed. Protecting both our clients’ data and business at large as well as our own is of the utmost importance.

It’s best practice to have a formal and mature intake process for AI ap­plications and a multidisciplinary panel that considers and prioritizes oppor­tunities for the business, as well as any implementation guardrails and cy­ber-security considerations. That panel should include representatives of tech­nology, business, regulatory compliance and HR. Putting that disciplined collec­tive effort into mitigating risks like data leaks or data breaches is essential.

The other element of this is the technology itself. The way a company like Alter Domus approaches that is with a platform construct. Instead of focusing on underlying infrastructure (such as GPUs), we chose to partner with cloud providers that offer robust ‘out of the box’ solutions that enable us to experiment, validate, and deploy AI solutions with little friction. Leverag­ing our partners that have robust end-to-end services that aggregate versus trained or partially trained algorithms is a smarter method for us.

For example, we have a relationship set up with AWS using some of their services, such as SageMaker and Bed­rock, which deliver pre-packaged plat­forms of large language models. That is central to our strategy because we get immediate access to enhanced technol­ogy and capabilities.

One of the ways we approach AI gov­ernance is to consider use cases in three buckets: ready-made solutions we can buy (such as co-pilots that can be easily integrated into our workspace produc­tivity tools); capabilities and tools, built by Alter Domus, that enhance the effi­cacy of our employees’ service delivery to clients; and AI capabilities embedded into products, delivering sophisticated analytical capabilities and meaningful insights to our clients.

Q Why is private credit a particular area of focus, and what advances are being made there?

We feel the private credit space really lends itself to the last two of those three categories. There are tens of millions of unstructured documents and data sources in private credit, with many in PDF, Excel or even fax format.

We have a product called Digitize that processes 30 million documents, extracting, classifying, and incorporat­ing content into client-facing products. Then it becomes easier to use genera­tive AI and the analysis of that data re­quires less human input, leading to bet­ter outcomes, faster turnaround times and cost savings for clients.

Q Is AI replacing humans in the use cases you see?

I think for the foreseeable future, AI is about creating substantially better tools for humans to use, but we still need hu­mans. Instead of using manual tools to deliver outputs, you can speed up processes and get more reliable results using AI, and that is more rewarding work for the humans involved.

For now, we still need humans to oversee those processes, to check that AI is working properly, which means there is an upskilling opportunity and AI is simply taking away the more mundane elements of tasks. In the longer-term, AI will free our teams to focus on more strategic areas of work.

Q What do you expect to be the most exciting developments in this area in the near future?

We are focused on building out our data and analytics business as a com­prehensive data platform making use of AI capabilities. That will take data from various siloes and make it available in a very secure and compliant way for our clients. We plan to employ AI to enable the data platform to deliver actionable insights and new analytical capabilities for our clients.

The key element in all of this is that you have to ‘feed the machine’: AI needs data to really learn and operate in the most effective way, and we sit on a treasure trove of data. We make cer­tain to prioritize the use cases that will have a beneficial impact on our clients. We want to give them more visibility into their funds than they have ever had before, allowing them to make faster and better formed decisions.